In a recent city council meeting, residents of East Missoula voiced strong opposition to a proposed housing development by De Novo Homes, citing concerns over traffic congestion, environmental impact, and the preservation of neighborhood character. The proposed Aspire subdivision, which aims to address the region's housing shortage, has sparked heated debate among community members who fear it will disrupt their quiet, scenic neighborhood.

Several residents, including Bruce Baxter and Janice Baxter, expressed worries that the construction of two-story homes would obstruct views and alter the character of East Missoula, which is known for its scenic landscapes and wildlife habitats. They highlighted the potential negative effects on local wildlife and the river ecosystem, urging the council to consider the environmental implications of increased chemical runoff from residential lawns.

Traffic concerns were a recurring theme, with multiple speakers pointing out that the existing infrastructure is inadequate to handle the anticipated increase in vehicles. Sue Holden emphasized that the traffic study conducted in 2021 did not account for recent developments and current traffic patterns, raising alarms about safety and congestion on local roads. Other residents echoed her sentiments, arguing that the proposed density of the development would exacerbate existing traffic issues, particularly on Summer Street and Highway 200.

Supporters of the development, including the developer Dave Sanson, argued that the project is essential for addressing the housing crisis in Missoula, where many residents, including public service workers, struggle to find affordable housing. Sanson emphasized the need for infill development to make efficient use of land and provide necessary housing options.

Despite the developer's assurances of community enhancements, including sidewalks and public access to the river, many residents remained skeptical. They questioned whether the proposed benefits would outweigh the potential drawbacks, particularly regarding the loss of open space and the character of their neighborhood.

As the council deliberates on the proposal, the voices of East Missoula residents reflect a community grappling with the challenges of growth and development while striving to preserve the qualities that make their neighborhood unique. The outcome of this meeting could set a precedent for future developments in the area, highlighting the ongoing tension between the need for housing and the desire to maintain community integrity.