In a recent Campbell County Board of Supervisors meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a special use permit request by Frank Johnson to operate an auto repair shop at his property on Clarks Road, which is currently zoned for agricultural use. Residents raised concerns about zoning violations, environmental hazards, and the potential negative impact on property values in the predominantly residential area.
During the meeting, it was highlighted that Johnson's property, which was purchased at a county auction, is zoned as \"A-1\" (agricultural) and does not permit the establishment of a commercial auto repair business without a special use permit. Community members argued that Johnson failed to adhere to zoning regulations, which require verification of zoning requirements before initiating business operations. They emphasized that the property should have been evaluated for compliance with local ordinances, particularly given the nature of the proposed business.
Residents expressed worries about the environmental implications of an auto repair shop, citing potential pollutants from vehicles and the risk of soil contamination. Concerns were also raised about the increasing number of vehicles on the property, with some residents reporting counts as high as 19 vehicles, which they claimed contributed to the area resembling a junkyard.
Johnson's statements regarding his business operations were scrutinized, with residents noting discrepancies between his claims and the reality observed on-site. For instance, while he stated that he would not hire employees, residents reported seeing additional individuals working on vehicles during business hours. Furthermore, Johnson's advertised hours of operation conflicted with his statements to the planning commission, raising questions about transparency.
Community members, including long-time residents, urged the board to consider the broader implications of granting the permit, arguing that it would disrupt the residential character of Clarks Road and set a concerning precedent for future zoning compliance. They called for the board to prioritize the interests of existing homeowners and the integrity of the neighborhood over the business aspirations of a single property owner.
The board has yet to make a decision on the permit request, but the strong community opposition suggests that any approval could lead to further disputes and challenges regarding zoning enforcement in the area.