During a recent Seattle Public Schools board meeting, community members expressed deep concerns regarding the district's proposed school closure plan, highlighting significant issues with transparency, oversight, and student safety.

One speaker, who identified themselves as a concerned parent, criticized the board for what they described as a rushed and flawed closure process. They argued that the decision-making lacked public support and was based on unreliable assumptions. The speaker outlined four main failures of the board: inadequate community engagement, neglect of oversight responsibilities, insufficient action to ensure student safety following the removal of School Resource Officers (SROs), and a general mismanagement of the closure process.

Another parent, Erin Combs, representing a grassroots group opposing the closure plan, echoed these sentiments. She pointed out that the board has not provided sufficient evidence that the closures would yield positive outcomes for students. Combs referenced data from other cities, suggesting that school closures do not effectively address budget deficits and often exacerbate inequities among students. She emphasized the need for meaningful dialogue with students and teachers, arguing that the current approach is detrimental to all families in the district.

In contrast, Valentina Aldonade, a parent advocating for the district's Dual Language Immersion (DLI) program, spoke about the benefits of bilingual education. She urged the board to expand the DLI program, citing its positive impact on cognitive development and academic performance. Aldonade highlighted the importance of maintaining cultural connections for families and the demand for such programs within the community.

The meeting underscored a growing discontent among parents and community members regarding the school board's strategies, with calls for a reevaluation of the proposed school closures and a stronger commitment to student safety and educational equity.