In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of Measure T on the city’s short-term rental (STR) program and the issuance of Coastal Development Permits (CDPs). The conversation highlighted significant uncertainties surrounding the potential effects of the measure, particularly regarding existing CDPs that prohibit STRs.

City officials noted that the Coastal Commission had previously approved the city’s STR program, asserting that it did not negatively impact public access to the coast. However, the passage of Measure T could complicate this approval, as it remains unclear how the Coastal Commission would interpret the measure in relation to the existing STR framework. This uncertainty raises concerns about future CDPs for homeowners associations (HOAs) that wish to ban STRs, as well as the validity of previously issued permits.

The discussion also touched on the annual review process for STR permits under Measure T, which would require applicants to reapply each year. This could potentially disrupt the established order, especially for HOAs with older covenants that outlaw STRs. Officials expressed skepticism about whether Measure T could override these covenants, suggesting that litigation might arise from the ambiguity.

Despite the uncertainties, some commissioners voiced support for the current STR program, citing its effectiveness and the lack of reported issues in their neighborhoods. They emphasized the importance of allowing communities to decide on STRs while acknowledging the need for clarity moving forward.

The meeting concluded without public comments, and the commissioners prepared to deliberate on the matter further, indicating a potential approval of the current STR program amidst the ongoing uncertainties surrounding Measure T.