During a recent government meeting, a proposal for development variances by Harris FLP was discussed, focusing on four specific requests related to landscaping and buffer requirements for a new commercial project in Zionsville. The petitioner, represented by attorney Matt Price, sought to eliminate foundation plantings, reduce the required parking lot perimeter landscaping, and relocate a buffer yard to enhance screening from adjacent residential properties.

Staff member Mister Smith presented an unfavorable recommendation for the variances, citing that the project was overbuilt given the zoning regulations and that hardships should not be self-created. He emphasized that the zoning ordinance had not changed and that the project was designed with knowledge of these existing rules.

Price countered the staff's position by highlighting that the variances requested were consistent with those previously granted for other developments along Michigan Road. He argued that the evolving nature of the area, which has shifted towards more residential use, justified the need for these variances. The proposed commercial building is intended to accommodate restaurants and other less intense business uses, reflecting the community's changing character.

The discussion also touched on the landscaping plan, with Price explaining that the design included outdoor dining areas and awnings, which would limit the viability of foundation plantings. Instead, he proposed relocating plantings to areas where they would thrive, such as flower boxes and along pathways, ensuring that the overall number of plantings would not decrease.

Concerns were raised about the visual impact of the building's design, particularly the lack of plantings on the north and south sides, which could create stark views from the road. Price assured that additional trees and shrubs would be added to meet landscaping requirements, particularly along the southern property line to buffer against residential areas.

The meeting concluded with ongoing discussions about the project's compliance with zoning standards and the potential for further modifications to the landscaping plan to address concerns raised by board members. The outcome of the variance requests remains pending as the board considers the implications of the proposed development on the surrounding community.