Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council considers controversial crosswalk removal decision

July 01, 2024 | La Verne City, Los Angeles County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council considers controversial crosswalk removal decision
During a recent city council meeting, officials convened a public hearing to discuss the proposed removal of a crosswalk at the intersection of Arrow Highway and B Street. City Engineer Cody Howling presented the case, highlighting that this crosswalk is the only one at the uncontrolled intersection, which lacks traffic signals or stop signs.

The intersection is characterized by a free flow of traffic, with vehicles traveling at a posted speed of 45 miles per hour. The crosswalk spans approximately 85 feet across six lanes of traffic. The decision to consider its removal arose after the installation of a new traffic signal at a nearby intersection, located 600 feet away, which prompted a review of pedestrian safety measures.

Howling explained that the removal process adheres to vehicle code requirements, necessitating public notice. Notices were posted at both ends of the crosswalk and on the city hall agenda board prior to the hearing. Staff recommended that the council consider public comments and ultimately direct the removal of the crosswalk, suggesting that an alternative crossing is available within reasonable proximity.

The council's decision will weigh public input against safety considerations at this busy intersection.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal