In a recent government meeting, Deputy Chief West faced intense scrutiny regarding a vote of no confidence initiated by the Supervisors Union, particularly focusing on Sergeant Sanchez's involvement. The discussions highlighted the complexities surrounding union dynamics and allegations of misconduct within the police department.
Ray Garza, the questioning party, emphasized that the union had the right to communicate about the vote of no confidence, asserting that it was not solely Sergeant Sanchez acting independently but rather a collective effort from the Supervisors Union. Deputy Chief West confirmed that he believed Sanchez was acting in his union capacity and had no personal issues with him.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The conversation also delved into allegations against Lieutenant Stetner and Kelly Valen, both of whom were implicated in pushing for the vote of no confidence. West suggested that Stetner's motivations were linked to a personal grievance regarding his wife's position within the department, while he expressed uncertainty about Valen's specific complaints against him.
The meeting further explored a 2019 complaint filed by Sergeant Sanchez against West, which had been investigated by Chief McCarthy. West claimed that Sanchez was found to be dishonest during that investigation, although he faced no disciplinary action. The dialogue revealed a contentious relationship between West and Sanchez, with West admitting to treating Sanchez with caution due to their history.
As the meeting progressed, the focus shifted to the authority and responsibilities of the acting chief during Chief Rossi's absence. West confirmed that while he oversaw operations, he remained in contact with Chief Rossi regarding personnel decisions, indicating a collaborative approach to leadership even in the chief's absence.
Overall, the meeting underscored the ongoing tensions within the police department, the challenges of union relations, and the complexities of leadership accountability in law enforcement.