In a recent court hearing focused on a family dealing with domestic violence, discussions centered on the reunification of children with their mother, Chanel, and the parenting time of their father, Mr. Deakins. The court was urged to maintain the current no-contact order between the parents during the review period, as the Department of Human Services (DHS) has determined that contact could hinder the reunification process.

Chanel's attorney highlighted her client's compliance with the case service plan and expressed a strong desire for the return of all three children. However, concerns were raised regarding the well-being of one child, Stormy, who has struggled significantly due to past trauma, including exposure to domestic violence and parental substance abuse. The attorney requested a more expedited review for the reunification of the other two children, emphasizing that they are ready to return home to their mother.

Mr. Deakins' attorney argued for increased parenting time, suggesting that he poses no threat to the children and should be allowed to see them in a more suitable environment. The attorney noted that both parents agree on the best interests of their children, advocating for their placement with Chanel. The court was encouraged to consider the parents' joint opinion, which reflects a surprising consensus in such cases.

The hearing also acknowledged the complexities surrounding Stormy's situation, recognizing her history of trauma and the challenges she faces. The court's decisions in this case will significantly impact the family's future, as they navigate the delicate balance of reunification and the children's well-being.