In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the need to update a long-standing contract related to marketing and visitor services, emphasizing the importance of aligning it with the city's fiscal year. The current contract has been repeatedly renewed without significant changes, leading to concerns that it no longer meets the community's needs.

Several members of the assembly highlighted the challenges posed by the existing contract's structure, which separates base funding on a calendar year from supplemental funding on a fiscal year. This misalignment complicates financial planning and execution, prompting calls for a Request for Proposal (RFP) to reassess and potentially revamp the contract.

Assembly member Tore noted that the timing of the contract's renewal is critical, stating, \"We are frankly past due to be doing this.\" He stressed that the situation surrounding tourism has evolved significantly, necessitating a reevaluation of the services provided to visitors.

Other members echoed this sentiment, with John pointing out that the dual funding cycles create confusion and inefficiencies. Tim added that the current framework does not adequately serve the community's interests, advocating for a contract that reflects the realities of the tourism landscape.

As discussions progressed, there was a consensus among assembly members that now is the opportune moment to initiate the RFP process. They expressed hope that the new contract would better align with the city's goals and effectively address the needs of both residents and visitors. The assembly plans to continue deliberating on the specifics of the RFP in upcoming meetings.