During a recent government meeting, property owners voiced concerns regarding significant tax assessments on their parcels, prompting discussions about property valuation and zoning classifications.

One property owner contested the assessment of his two parcels, arguing that one is essentially a non-buildable wetland, yet it is being taxed as a sellable property. He highlighted the impracticality of developing the land, citing the exorbitant costs associated with construction and utility access. The owner expressed frustration over a recent tax increase that nearly doubled his assessment, questioning the fairness of the valuation compared to similar properties in the area.

The assessor acknowledged the property’s unique characteristics, noting that it is primarily used as an extension of the main parcel rather than for agricultural purposes. The assessor recommended adjusting the property’s value to $83,214, reflecting its limited usability. The owner was advised to explore agricultural exemptions if he could demonstrate current agricultural use, although he indicated that the land could not support livestock.

Another property owner, Jim Upchurch, raised concerns about a 150% increase in the assessment of his one-acre parcel in Green Canyon. He noted that while he anticipated some increase due to new developments in the area, he found the jump excessive and requested a reassessment based on comparable properties. The assessor confirmed that many parcels in the vicinity lack utilities, which could impact their value.

The meeting concluded with motions to adjust the assessed values of the contested properties, reflecting the ongoing challenges property owners face in navigating tax assessments and land use regulations.