During a recent government meeting, two individuals seeking pardons shared their past offenses and current endeavors, highlighting their rehabilitation journeys.

The first applicant, Mr. Waldrop, recounted a significant mistake made after his release from prison, where he took money from a wallet found at a gas station. He explained that he returned the money and wrote an apology letter, which was submitted to his parole officer. Although he received a charge for the incident, it was added to his supervision rather than resulting in a revocation of his parole. Waldrop confirmed that he has since paid all restitution owed, a requirement for his early release from parole.

Waldrop also discussed his current status, noting that he holds a commercial driver's license and previously had a hazmat endorsement. He acknowledged past speeding tickets and a deferred prosecution agreement for disorderly conduct stemming from a tumultuous relationship. He completed a mandated 32-week course related to the incident, which he believes has since been expunged.

The second applicant, Mr. Andre Dallas, detailed his criminal history involving three counts of burglary and home invasion in 2014. He described how he and two associates entered unlocked dorm rooms at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, taking personal belongings. Dallas served ten months in a correctional facility, followed by probation, during which he maintained employment and pursued education.

Since completing his sentence, Dallas has successfully established his own trucking company, Dallas Trucking, which has been operational since 2017. He expressed a desire for a pardon to expand his business opportunities, particularly in securing government contracts that currently exclude individuals with felony records. Dallas emphasized his personal growth, educational achievements, and commitment to his family, including a recent marriage and home purchase.

Both applicants' testimonies reflect their efforts to move beyond past mistakes and contribute positively to their communities. The board concluded the session without further questions, indicating a thorough review of the applicants' cases.