During a recent Cibolo city council meeting, community concerns regarding local development projects were prominently voiced, particularly focusing on safety and environmental impacts. Residents expressed their apprehensions about a proposed self-storage facility and a convenience store with fuel sales, both of which are set to be developed in areas close to schools and residential neighborhoods.

Local resident Susan raised alarms about the hazardous conditions created by trash and debris from vehicles, particularly pickups and trailers, which she claimed pose risks to children in the vicinity. She emphasized the need for better management of waste and traffic safety, especially along Old Wiederstein Road, which is already plagued by litter.

Jeff Echols, a real estate developer, presented plans for a self-storage facility on a 14.7-acre tract, seeking approval for approximately 900 to 950 units. He assured the council that the development would include necessary infrastructure improvements, such as a detention pond for stormwater management and fire access routes. Echols highlighted that the project aligns with the city’s economic development goals and would contribute significantly to the local tax base.

David Marbach, the property owner, also voiced his support for the storage facility, arguing that it would attract further business to the area and generate essential tax revenue. He noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission had already approved the proposal, indicating community backing for the project.

Conversely, concerns were raised regarding a proposed convenience store with fuel sales at Borgfeld and Dobie Boulevard. Residents like Sherry Denter expressed worries about the safety implications of adding another gas station near two schools, citing existing traffic congestion and the potential for increased accidents. Another resident, Sharon Fumia, echoed these sentiments, advocating for the preservation of green spaces instead of further commercial development. She suggested that the area could be better utilized for parks or recreational facilities, which would enhance community well-being.

The council did not vote on these items during the meeting, but the discussions highlighted a growing tension between development and community safety, with residents calling for more thoughtful planning that prioritizes the needs of families and the environment. The council is expected to revisit these proposals in upcoming meetings, where further public input will be considered.