Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

New cannabis labeling rules spark heated public debate

June 29, 2024 | Cannabis Compliance Board (CCB), Other State Agencies, Organizations, Executive, Nevada



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New cannabis labeling rules spark heated public debate
In a recent government meeting, board members discussed proposed changes to cannabis labeling regulations, focusing on three options for updating Section 12.065.

Option A suggests adding language to several subsections regarding treatment or mediation disclosures while eliminating Section 12.065 entirely. This option, previously proposed in a Mayenne meeting, would allow cultivators and producers to draft disclosures at their discretion.

Option B maintains the existing labeling requirements of Section 12.065, which had been previously passed by the legislature but was put on hold for further review.

Option C, which garnered support from industry representatives, revises Section 12.065 based on public comments received during the last board meeting. This option mandates that cultivation and production facilities disclose their processes to sales facilities and consumers upon request. It allows for various forms of disclosure, including hard copies, electronic documents, or labels. Additionally, it requires a notice at points of sale indicating that such documents are available, and clarifies that establishments can disclose if their products have not been treated or remediated.

During the public comment period, Frank Hawkins, representing Nevada Wellness Center dispensaries, expressed support for Option C. He emphasized the importance of transparency in cannabis sales, particularly regarding the sale of radiated products. Hawkins proposed that dispensaries should provide clear labeling and information through barcodes and QR codes on their websites, allowing consumers to access health information easily.

The board is expected to vote on adopting the proposed language under NCCR 12, which does not directly relate to the discussed changes. The meeting highlighted the ongoing efforts to balance regulatory compliance with industry needs and consumer safety in the evolving cannabis market.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting