In a recent government meeting, Pastor Corey Adkins, representing Reclaim Church, presented a petition to rezone properties located at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Parkway Drive from a single-family residential district (R-1) to a highway commercial district (C-2). This request includes parcels owned entirely by the church, which meets the necessary land area and ownership requirements for such a change.

The church seeks to lease its former fellowship hall for retail purposes, a use not permitted under the current R-1 zoning. Adkins argued that the reclassification to C-2 would align the property with surrounding commercial areas, allowing for a broader range of uses that could benefit the community.

However, city staff raised significant concerns regarding the potential impact of this rezoning. The C-2 district permits higher densities and a variety of commercial uses that could disrupt the character of the adjacent residential neighborhood. Staff emphasized that the existing R-1 zoning is intended to protect low-density residential areas from intense commercial encroachment, which could diminish property values and alter the quality of life for residents.

The staff's analysis highlighted that the proposed change is inconsistent with the city’s 2025 comprehensive plan, which designates the area as \"Hills Residential,\" aimed at preserving the historic residential character. They noted that no significant economic, physical, or social changes have occurred since the plan's adoption that would warrant a reevaluation of the current zoning.

Concerns were also raised about the potential for \"spot zoning,\" where a small tract of land is singled out for a different use than surrounding properties, potentially benefiting the property owner at the expense of the community. The staff recommended that the planning commission advise the city council to deny the rezoning request, citing the need to maintain the integrity of the residential neighborhood and the intended purpose of the R-1 district.

The discussion concluded with an invitation for questions from the commission, indicating ongoing deliberation about the implications of the proposed zoning change.