During a recent government meeting, a local resident voiced significant concerns regarding the rising costs and regulatory hurdles associated with obtaining electric and gas services in the area. The individual, who is in the process of rebuilding a residential property, highlighted the requirement for a Certificate of Occupancy (CEO) to secure new electrical service, despite the property’s long-standing residential status.

The resident expressed frustration over the $403 fee imposed for new service connections, which they argued is excessive given the minimal work involved. They noted that in the past, such services were provided at no cost, and questioned the fairness of current practices, especially for single-family homes. The resident also criticized the power authority for a lack of responsiveness to their inquiries and for what they described as monopolistic practices that burden consumers with additional fees.

In addition to the service connection fees, the resident raised concerns about the maintenance responsibilities placed on homeowners for meter equipment, which they claimed adds further financial strain. They recounted a troubling experience with an inaccurate meter reading that resulted in an inflated bill, and expressed dissatisfaction with the power authority's refusal to adjust the charges despite evidence of the error.

The resident urged local legislators to consider enacting a law that would allow for temporary Certificates of Occupancy for utility services, thereby alleviating some of the financial burdens imposed by current regulations. They emphasized that the issue affects not only individual homeowners but the community at large, calling for action to address what they perceive as unfair practices in the utility sector.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion on the matter, as the resident's concerns reflect broader issues regarding utility regulation and consumer rights in the region.