In a recent government meeting, officials discussed significant changes to housing requirements in Claremont, driven by the worsening state housing crisis. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has recalibrated the formula for calculating housing needs, which now includes both projected and existing housing demands. This adjustment has resulted in a notable increase in housing responsibilities for Claremont and other cities across the state, reflecting the urgent need for more housing options for residents currently living in overcrowded or unaffordable conditions.

Commissioners raised questions regarding the implications of state laws, including SB 9, which allows for lot splitting and increased density in certain areas, although restrictions apply in high fire hazard zones. The discussion also touched on the complexities of density calculations under AB 1397, with some confusion over the minimum unit yield required for development.

The meeting highlighted the area median income for Los Angeles County, estimated at around $100,000 for a household of four, and the challenges posed by rising housing costs outpacing income growth. Officials confirmed that state mandates require equitable distribution of new housing throughout the city, a directive aimed at addressing historical segregation patterns.

City Attorney Alicia Patterson clarified the consequences of a negative recommendation from the planning commission, noting that it would still advance to the city council but would require a supermajority for approval. If both bodies reject the proposal, Claremont would remain subject to penalties under state law due to its existing housing element.

Public comments reflected community concerns about the revised housing element, particularly regarding perceived preferential treatment for affluent areas and the potential for exclusionary zoning practices. Residents urged the commission to reconsider the proposed changes, emphasizing the need for equitable treatment across all neighborhoods in Claremont.

As the city grapples with its housing strategy, the discussions underscore the tension between state mandates for increased housing and local priorities for maintaining neighborhood character and inclusivity.