Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Court issues emergency protection order amid aggravated assault case

July 27, 2024 | Travis County Court, Texas Courts, Judicial, Texas



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Court issues emergency protection order amid aggravated assault case
In a recent court session, two individuals were granted emergency protection orders following serious criminal charges. The first case involved a defendant who was released on a personal bond after being informed of a protective order prohibiting them from approaching a specified address in Pflugerville, Texas, where the protected party, Lauren Contreras Lopez, resides. The order is effective until August 26, 2024, and mandates that the defendant must remain at least 200 yards away from the protected address.

The second case involved a defendant, Mr. Brooks, charged with a second-degree felony for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. His bail was set at $15,000, and he was also subjected to an emergency protection order that prohibits him from contacting the complaining witness, Thomas Douglas, except through legal counsel. Mr. Brooks is required to maintain a distance of 200 yards from Douglas's residence in Austin, Texas, with the order remaining in effect until September 25, 2024.

Both defendants were informed of their rights regarding legal representation, with Mr. Brooks indicating he would not seek a court-appointed attorney due to his existing parole attorney. The court emphasized the seriousness of the protective orders and the consequences of non-compliance, underscoring the judicial system's commitment to ensuring the safety of individuals involved in these cases.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI