In a contentious government meeting, Putnam County legislators debated a proposed charter change that would grant the county legislature the authority to remove the county attorney from office. The discussion highlighted the complex relationship between the county attorney, the legislature, and the executive branch, with concerns raised about the timing and implications of the proposal.

The proposal was introduced amid an ongoing ethics complaint against the current county attorney, leading some legislators to question whether the change was an attempt at retaliation. Legislator Montgomery expressed serious concerns about the rushed nature of the proposal, which was added to the agenda with only five days' notice. He argued that it would be inappropriate to act before the ethics board had rendered its decision, suggesting that the move could be perceived as unlawful retaliation.

Supporters of the charter change argued that it was a necessary safeguard to ensure the legislature's voice in the appointment and potential removal of the county attorney, emphasizing that the position requires full-time commitment. They proposed an amendment to exempt the current county attorney from the new rule, applying it only to future appointments.

Opponents, however, criticized the lack of transparency and proper review of the proposal, noting that it had not been vetted by the county executive or legal department. They expressed discomfort with the optics of the situation, fearing that the proposal could be seen as politically motivated.

The meeting underscored a broader debate about the balance of power within county government and the appropriate processes for enacting significant changes to governance structures. As discussions continued, the future of the proposed charter change remained uncertain, with calls for further deliberation and input from the ethics board before any action is taken.