During a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the approval of a consent calendar item related to the undergrounding of utilities for a new development project known as the box block. Council member Ferguson criticized the city manager's handling of the item, suggesting that it was being presented in a manner that favored the developer rather than providing an impartial assessment.

Ferguson pointed out that the report claimed there would be no fiscal impact associated with the undergrounding of utilities, a statement he deemed \"blatantly untrue.\" He highlighted that the project would incur a cost of approximately $460,000 for the undergrounding, which he argued should not be overlooked. The council member emphasized that undergrounding utilities is a standard requirement for new developments, established in municipal code since 1990, and that waivers are often granted selectively.

The discussion underscored the broader implications of such decisions, as Ferguson noted that waiving the cost represents a significant financial benefit to the developer, which the city would forgo. He acknowledged the potential positive contributions of the development, including the addition of a microbrewery and restaurants, but maintained that the financial aspects and adherence to established regulations should not be compromised. The meeting highlighted ongoing tensions between development interests and fiscal responsibility within the city council.