In a poignant address to the Worthington City Council, a local resident recounted her family's distressing experience with a proposed sewer easement that has lingered for four years. The resident detailed how she and her husband were pressured by a city-hired attorney to sign over an easement for a sewer on their property without any financial compensation. They were left in the dark about critical details, such as the depth of the sewer and its proximity to their home’s foundation.

The resident expressed deep concerns about the impact of the project on their property, including the removal of trees and loss of access to their backyard, which houses their chickens and garages. She highlighted the emotional toll this situation has taken on her family, particularly regarding the safety of her young child with a 20-foot trench planned for their yard.

Despite the city attorney's claims that the overflowing sewage from a neighboring property constituted a state of emergency, the resident criticized the lack of transparency and consideration from the city. She noted that most property owners had acquiesced to the project, leaving her and her husband feeling isolated and unjustly treated.

The resident's testimony underscored a broader frustration with the city's handling of the easement process, raising questions about the use of eminent domain and the rights of homeowners. She called for the city to reconsider the sewer's placement, suggesting it be moved to public right-of-way, as had been done in earlier phases of the project.

As the council meeting concluded, the resident's plea for justice and acknowledgment of her family's plight resonated, leaving many to ponder the implications of the city's actions on community trust and property rights.