Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council Faces Tough Questions on Police Budget and Surveillance

June 03, 2024 | Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council Faces Tough Questions on Police Budget and Surveillance
During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered on the fiscal position of the city and the police department's budget, with public comments highlighting concerns over transparency and accountability in spending.

Alan Shea, a community member, commended the police department for releasing video footage of an incident from April 13, emphasizing the importance of technology in charter reform. However, he raised questions regarding the allocation of reserves for payout claims, seeking clarity on whether these funds fall under risk management evaluations and how they impact taxpayer money, especially in light of potential funding reductions for community needs.

Another speaker, Yadi, expressed concerns about the police department's budget, specifically regarding the future of the ShotSpotter program, which is currently in a three-year pilot phase. Yadi noted the lack of clarity on whether the program would be extended and raised similar questions about the deployment of automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) and the associated data-sharing policies. She urged the council to ensure that data collected by these surveillance tools is not shared for commercial purposes, particularly in light of recent issues surrounding reproductive health care.

Yadi also highlighted the reliance on asset forfeiture funds and homeland security grants for purchasing surveillance equipment, calling for a more transparent approach to funding and data retention policies. She referenced Governor Newsom's recent statement regarding data retention periods for similar technologies in Northern California, advocating for the city to adopt comparable standards.

The meeting underscored the community's demand for greater transparency in budget allocations and the management of surveillance technologies, reflecting ongoing concerns about privacy and the responsible use of public funds.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal