City's housing plan faces backlash over restrictive code changes

During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of a new state mandate aimed at increasing moderate income housing in Pleasant Grove. The city has introduced a five-year plan to deregulate and incentivize housing opportunities, yet this initiative faces challenges due to proposed restrictions on flag lot codes, which could undermine these goals.

The Pleasant Grove General Plan mandates that municipalities include a moderate income housing plan, which outlines existing conditions, future housing demand, and strategies to meet that demand. To qualify for state transportation funding, the city must implement at least three housing affordability strategies, with an additional two required for priority funding.

Two key strategies highlighted include reducing regulations for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and multifamily residential dwellings. Proponents argue that allowing flag lots—parcels that can create homeowners—would better serve the community than ADUs, which primarily offer rental opportunities. The proposed restrictions on flag lots, however, are seen as contradictory to the city’s housing strategies and could significantly reduce property tax revenue while limiting opportunities for moderate income families.

The discussion also emphasized the unique characteristics of Pleasant Grove, which has a historical land subdivision pattern that makes flag lots particularly suitable. Advocates for maintaining flag lot allowances argue that a one-size-fits-all approach to zoning does not consider the specific needs and conditions of the community.

Concerns were raised about the potential negative impact on property values and rights, with some officials warning that the new code could result in substantial financial losses for residents. The meeting underscored the need for a balanced approach that considers both housing opportunities and the rights of property owners in Pleasant Grove.