During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the pressing need to reassess and potentially implement new tax structures to address the city's financial challenges. The conversation highlighted four primary tax categories: short-term rental tax, food and beverage transactional tax, utility tax, and fuel tax. The officials emphasized the importance of ensuring that existing revenue streams are optimized before introducing new taxes, particularly in light of the community's potential resistance to additional taxation.

One council member noted the necessity of aligning the city’s financial audits and revenue collection processes, stating that without a solid financial foundation, it would be difficult to gain public support for new taxes. The discussion also touched on the experiences of other cities, such as Hermiston, which successfully implemented a public safety fee to address budget deficits, suggesting that community engagement and transparency are crucial for similar initiatives.

The council debated the timeline for researching and discussing these tax proposals with community members, with suggestions to tackle one tax at a time to avoid overwhelming staff and the public. Concerns were raised about the current workload of city staff, particularly regarding delayed audits and ongoing legal issues, which could hinder the implementation of new taxes.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the importance of public input in the decision-making process, particularly regarding whether new taxes should be put to a vote. Officials acknowledged that while some taxes could be implemented without a public vote, engaging the community would likely foster greater acceptance and understanding of the financial measures being considered.