In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed dredging project and the installation of commercial ballot floats in local waterways. Key discussions emphasized the necessity for state-level oversight before any local board actions, as the state holds the authority to determine public rights in tidal areas and assess the project's viability.
The meeting highlighted that the applicants require multiple licenses—not only for dredging and bulkhead relocation but also for the installation of the floats, which differ from typical recreational permits. These floats are classified under a commercial operation, necessitating a more rigorous review process.
Participants stressed the importance of conducting a thorough peer review of wetland resource areas, including shellfish and eelgrass surveys, before any decisions are made. This review is crucial for understanding the environmental implications of the proposed structures and ensuring compliance with variance standards. A dispute over the delineation of shellfish areas was noted, with photographic evidence presented to challenge previous determinations.
Additionally, concerns were raised about the lack of coordination with local property owners, specifically regarding proposed work on the Kelleher property, where there appears to be confusion over property boundaries.
Safety issues were also a focal point, with worries expressed about the potential hazards to swimmers and boaters in the channel, particularly due to strong currents that could lead to entanglement with the floats and create navigational challenges.
The meeting concluded with a call for further evaluation and a comprehensive review process before any recommendations are made, underscoring the need for careful consideration of environmental and community impacts.