During a recent government meeting, community members expressed concerns regarding the placement of a new telecommunications pole, emphasizing its proximity to a previously withdrawn application. The distance between the initial and new application is approximately 200 feet, raising questions about the appropriateness of the location for residents.

One speaker highlighted that while the new site may be the most cost-effective option for AT&T, it does not necessarily serve the best interests of the community. They proposed alternative locations, such as the community center, which they believe would be less obtrusive. Additionally, they pointed out that the lowest points in the harbor area, specifically on Rebecca and Lighthouse Road, could be more suitable for the equipment, potentially enhancing service for emergency responders.

The discussion also touched on the possibility of utilizing the lighthouse area for the installation, suggesting it could provide a revenue stream for the tenant. The speaker urged the committee to consider these alternatives seriously.

In response, representatives from AT&T acknowledged the community's concerns and explained that the current pole location was chosen due to opposition to a previous site. They indicated that while they had explored other locations, they were outside the designated search area and did not provide adequate coverage compared to the proposed site. The representatives presented coverage maps to illustrate the differences in service quality among the various locations considered.

The meeting underscored the ongoing dialogue between community members and telecommunications providers as they navigate the balance between infrastructure needs and local concerns.