In the dimly lit chambers of Albany City Hall, a heated debate unfolded during the City Council meeting on December 11, 2024. The air was thick with tension as council members and citizens alike grappled with pressing issues surrounding housing affordability and taxation.

One of the most contentious topics was the proposed Construction Excise Tax (CET), aimed at funding affordable housing initiatives. Critics voiced strong opposition, arguing that the tax would disproportionately burden residents and fail to address the underlying housing crisis. A speaker passionately denounced the CET as a "Robinhood tax," claiming it unfairly takes from one group to benefit another, while only a fraction of the collected funds would actually support new construction projects.

Another resident, Mike Quinn, raised concerns about the city's surplus properties, questioning their viability for housing development. He highlighted the complexities of zoning regulations and the potential for lengthy bureaucratic hurdles, suggesting that the city had not fully considered the implications of its housing strategies. Quinn also pointed out the financial impact of rising housing costs, emphasizing that even small increases could lead to significant long-term mortgage burdens for families.

As the discussion progressed, the council faced interruptions and calls for decorum, reflecting the passionate sentiments of those present. Some speakers urged the council to delay decisions on the CET until after the new year, advocating for a more thorough examination of the city's housing policies and their potential consequences.

Jason Cadwell, another participant, echoed these sentiments, stressing the importance of understanding future projects before imposing new taxes. He referenced a housing report that noted the city of Newburgh had recently halted its CET program, citing similar challenges faced by Albany.

The meeting underscored a growing divide within the community regarding the best path forward for addressing housing needs. As the council members listened to the diverse perspectives, it became clear that the decisions made in the coming months would have lasting implications for Albany's residents and the future of affordable housing in the city. The dialogue, marked by both frustration and hope, highlighted the complexities of local governance and the urgent need for effective solutions to a pressing crisis.