Kelseyville name change debate intensifies as community voices clash over historical legacy

In a recent meeting of the Lake County Board of Supervisors, the contentious issue of renaming Kelseyville took center stage, igniting passionate discussions among community members and officials alike. The meeting, held on December 10, 2024, drew a diverse crowd, reflecting the deep-seated emotions surrounding the name, which many associate with historical injustices against Native Americans.

As the meeting unfolded, voices from both sides of the debate emerged. Some residents expressed a desire to retain the name Kelseyville, citing concerns over the practical implications of a name change, particularly for the elderly population who would face significant challenges in updating personal documents and addresses. One resident articulated the fear that changing the name could be more damaging than healing, emphasizing the need for a thoughtful approach to the community's history.

Conversely, advocates for the name change highlighted the painful legacy associated with Andrew Kelsey, the town's namesake, who is remembered for his role in the oppression of Native peoples. Bartholin Brown, a member of the Lehi Pomo tribe, passionately argued that the name perpetuates a history of violence and trauma, calling for a collective reckoning with the past. He emphasized the importance of education and dialogue in moving forward, suggesting that the community must confront its history to foster healing.

The Board of Supervisors discussed various options, including keeping the name, changing it to Kenoctay, or allowing the community to propose a new name. Vice Chair Crandall and Supervisor Simon both expressed support for a name change, with Simon stating, "The town of Kelseyville name will change before they put me back in the earth." This sentiment resonated with many who believe that acknowledging and addressing historical wrongs is essential for community healing.

The meeting concluded with a call for continued dialogue and education, recognizing that this issue is far from resolved. As the Board prepares to submit its recommendations to the U.S. Board of Geographic Names, the community remains divided yet hopeful that a path toward reconciliation can be forged. The discussions reflect a broader movement across the nation to reassess place names that honor figures associated with oppression, highlighting the ongoing struggle for justice and recognition of Indigenous histories.