In a recent Gilbert Town Council meeting, residents of College Park Country Estates voiced their strong opposition to the planned removal of trees along public rights of way, a decision they argue contradicts established town policies and community values. The meeting, held on December 3, 2024, highlighted concerns over the Gilbert Streets Department's plan to begin tree removals on December 16, 2024, with further removals scheduled through June 30, 2027.

Brandon, a lifelong resident of the neighborhood, presented a compelling case against the removals, citing a certified arborist's report that deemed the trees healthy and low-risk. He emphasized that the removal plan undermines the town's general plan, which promotes the preservation of urban tree canopies and the enhancement of neighborhood quality. Brandon noted that College Park Country Estates, one of Gilbert's original neighborhoods established in 1972, lacks a homeowners association, making the town's commitment to maintaining the area’s landscaping even more critical.

Residents like Rianne Wood and Rose Hograff echoed these sentiments, sharing personal stories about the trees' significance to their community. Wood highlighted the ecological benefits, noting that the trees provide essential shade, keeping neighborhood temperatures cooler than surrounding areas. Hograff pointed out that the trees are integral to the local habitat, supporting wildlife such as Harris Hawks.

The residents argued that the proposed removals not only threaten the aesthetic and environmental integrity of their neighborhood but also disregard the town's own policies aimed at fostering a healthier community through strategic urban forestry. They called for the council to reconsider the removals and engage in further community discussions to explore alternative solutions that would allow for the preservation of these trees.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between municipal planning and community interests, as residents urged the council to align its actions with the values and needs of its constituents. As the scheduled removal date approaches, the outcome of this debate remains uncertain, with residents hopeful for a resolution that honors their neighborhood's history and environmental health.