In a spirited meeting held on November 13, 2024, the General Plan Review Committee of Prescott engaged in a heated debate over a contentious provision regarding discrimination and harassment language in the city’s land use document. The atmosphere in the room was charged as committee members expressed their differing views on whether to retain or remove specific language that some argued could pave the way for an anti-discrimination ordinance.

The discussion began with committee member Ralph Hess defending the inclusion of the language, emphasizing its importance in reflecting the city’s values. He argued that the provision was a necessary acknowledgment of non-land use characteristics that define Prescott. However, dissenting voices quickly emerged, with members like Jim McCarver advocating for its removal, citing concerns over potential legal implications and the appropriateness of such language in a land use document.

Terry Sapio raised alarms about the provision being a precursor to a broader anti-discrimination ordinance, referencing past legal battles in Colorado that had significant financial repercussions. He expressed skepticism about the necessity of the language, asserting that Prescott does not have a discrimination problem that warrants such a statement. This sentiment resonated with several members who echoed concerns about the divisiveness the language could create within the community.

As the debate unfolded, it became clear that the committee was divided, with a 5-5 split on whether to keep the language as it stood. Some members, like Don Michelman, highlighted the extensive discussions that had already taken place on the topic, arguing that the majority had previously voted in favor of the language and should not be swayed by last-minute objections.

The committee chair reminded members that their role was to review the draft before it moved to the Planning and Zoning Commission, where further amendments could be made. This process would ultimately lead to a final decision by the city council, who would consider the recommendations from both the committee and the commission.

As the meeting drew to a close, the tension lingered in the air, underscoring the complexity of balancing community values with legal considerations. The outcome of this debate will not only shape the city’s general plan but also reflect the ongoing dialogue about inclusivity and governance in Prescott. The committee's recommendations will now be forwarded for further review, leaving residents and officials alike to ponder the implications of this divisive issue.