The Clallam County Commissioners held a regular meeting on December 3, 2024, where community members voiced strong opinions on several agenda items, particularly regarding funding allocations and public engagement.

One of the most contentious topics was the proposed payment of $34,000 to Cascadia Consulting Group, part of a larger $370,000 contract for consulting on the county's comprehensive plan. Residents expressed frustration over the lack of transparency and awareness surrounding this contract. Don Worthington, a Sequim resident, criticized the payment, suggesting it was part of a broader agenda influenced by external pressures. He and others raised concerns about the implications of such payments on local governance and community priorities.

Public comments also highlighted dissatisfaction with the county's handling of land acquisition processes. Ed Bowen questioned the ambiguity surrounding a letter of support for acquiring land adjacent to Hoco River State Park, arguing that the county had not adequately communicated the boundaries or purpose of the acquisition. He emphasized the need for public input and transparency in decisions that affect local resources.

Additionally, Peter Craig, chair of the county parks advisory board, expressed disappointment over the lack of funding for a new parks master plan, which he argued is crucial for the community's economic and recreational development. He urged the commissioners to prioritize this funding in the upcoming budget.

The meeting underscored a growing demand for robust public engagement in county decisions. Several residents called for more opportunities for community input, particularly in light of recent decisions that they felt were made without adequate public consultation. This sentiment was echoed by Jeff Tosa, who pointed out that citizen participation is essential for effective local governance.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the commissioners face significant pressure to improve communication and transparency with the community. The discussions reflect a broader desire among residents for a more inclusive approach to governance that prioritizes public input and accountability in decision-making processes.