During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding longstanding drainage issues linked to a 2012 community master plan. A participant highlighted that the county had been aware of these drainage problems for over a decade, particularly in relation to a subdivision approved for affluent residents.

The discussion centered on the county's decision to construct a road through a large pond, which was identified as a critical drainage area. This action, coupled with the approval of the new subdivision, exacerbated existing drainage challenges. The participant pointed out that instead of addressing these issues, the county opted to divert drainage into a Hawaiian cultural area, disregarding the potential impact on significant cultural resources.

The speaker emphasized that the county's failure to implement a proper drainage plan, despite acknowledging the problem in the 2012 master plan, reflects a troubling pattern of neglect. They criticized the county's justification for allowing the cultural site to serve as a drainage area, arguing that the absence of residences should not diminish the importance of protecting cultural resources.

This meeting underscored the ongoing tension between development and cultural preservation, as well as the need for more proactive measures from local authorities to address environmental and community concerns.