The Colorado Public Utilities Commission meeting on December 2, 2024, focused on the proposed tariff adjustments by Black Hills Colorado Electric, specifically addressing concerns about high electricity rates and their impact on local economic development.

During the session, community representatives expressed frustration over the utility's rates, suggesting that they hinder economic growth and urging the company to consider selling to a larger utility. In response, Black Hills representatives indicated a willingness to listen to offers but noted that there had been no recent proposals for acquisition. The discussion highlighted a disconnect between the utility's leadership and community sentiment, with some officials asserting that while there are positive aspects of service, the predominant feedback from customers revolves around affordability issues.

A significant point of contention was the utility's approach to rate increases, with critics arguing that Black Hills has not adequately considered affordability in its applications. The company defended its position, stating that it had scaled back its initial rate increase request after receiving public feedback. However, questions arose regarding why the company did not incorporate affordability considerations from the outset of its application process.

The meeting also touched on the utility's clean energy plan, which was encouraged but not mandated due to the company's small customer base. Concerns were raised about potential customer backlash if they were aware of the proposed rate increases while the clean energy plan was being discussed. Black Hills representatives emphasized the economic benefits of the clean energy initiative, including significant emission reductions and cost offsets for fuel.

Overall, the meeting underscored the ongoing tension between Black Hills Colorado Electric and the communities it serves, particularly regarding rate increases and the utility's responsiveness to customer concerns. The commission's decisions in this matter could have lasting implications for both the utility's operations and the economic landscape of the affected communities.