Duke Energy faces backlash over proposed gas plants amid health and environmental concerns in Roxborough

November 22, 2024 | Environmental Quality, Cabinet Departments, Organizations, Executive, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Duke Energy faces backlash over proposed gas plants amid health and environmental concerns in Roxborough
The North Carolina Division of Air Quality (DAQ) held a public hearing on November 22, 2024, to discuss Duke Energy's proposed air permit for two new methane gas plants in Person County. The meeting featured a range of speakers, including local residents, students, and community leaders, who expressed strong opposition to the project, citing health, environmental, and economic concerns.

The first speaker, Dylan Kessler, a law and political science student at Duke University, urged the DAQ to deny the air permit, highlighting the dangers of methane emissions, which are significantly more harmful than carbon dioxide. Kessler pointed out that the proposed plants would increase the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide, exacerbating existing health disparities in the Roxborough community, which already faces high rates of chronic diseases and infant mortality.

Kimmy Diver, another Duke student, echoed these concerns, emphasizing the historical pollution from Duke Energy's operations and the potential for increased health risks, particularly for vulnerable populations. Diver criticized the company's focus on profit over public health and called for a rejection of the permit to protect the community's well-being.

Fisher Mallon, also a student, raised economic concerns, noting that Duke Energy's estimates suggest significant rate increases for customers, which would disproportionately affect low-income households. Mallon argued for the adoption of renewable energy alternatives, such as distributed solar, instead of investing in new fossil fuel infrastructure.

Amir Mahdrey shared personal anecdotes about the health impacts on his family and community, urging the DAQ to consider the long-term consequences of approving the permit. He highlighted the need for accountability from Duke Energy regarding emissions and the financial burden on residents.

In contrast, Gordon Powell, chairman of the Person County Board of Commissioners, supported the construction of the new plants, arguing that they are essential for meeting North Carolina's growing energy demands and maintaining reliable power supply. He emphasized the economic benefits the plants would bring to the local community.

Beth Townsend, a representative from Duke Energy, defended the company's commitment to a diverse energy portfolio, including renewable sources, and highlighted the community engagement efforts of Duke Energy employees.

Hope Taylor, executive director of Clean Water for North Carolina, concluded the hearing by expressing grave concerns about the permit's implications for public health and environmental justice. She criticized the lack of enforceable timelines for shutting down existing coal units and called for a shift towards renewable energy solutions.

The hearing underscored the deep divisions in the community regarding Duke Energy's plans, with many residents advocating for a more sustainable and equitable energy future. The DAQ will consider the public comments before making a decision on the air permit application.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI