In a packed room filled with concerned citizens and environmental advocates, the Duke Roxboro Public Hearing unfolded, revealing deep divisions over the future of energy production in North Carolina. The atmosphere was charged as speakers voiced their apprehensions about Duke Energy's plans to invest heavily in fossil fuel infrastructure, a move many believe could lead to long-term environmental and economic consequences.

One passionate speaker highlighted the staggering $1 billion earmarked for fossil fuel facilities, arguing that these investments would become obsolete before they are even completed. "We will be stuck with these facilities for 30 years," they lamented, advocating instead for solar energy solutions that could transform rooftops and vacant lots into clean energy sources. This vision of a solar-powered future resonated with many in attendance, who see it as a path toward sustainability and economic benefit.

As the hearing progressed, Chris Fair, a community member and engineer, raised critical questions about the transparency of Duke's data. He expressed skepticism over the company's claims regarding emissions and safety, stating, "I don't trust us anymore." Fair's concerns were echoed by others who demanded empirical evidence rather than vague assurances, particularly regarding methane emissions, which are significantly more harmful than carbon dioxide.

Thomas Gooding, representing the Southern Environmental Law Center, urged the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to deny Duke's permit application or require substantial modifications. He pointed out that Duke's assumptions in their application were flawed, allowing them to evade stricter pollution limits. Gooding emphasized the potential health risks posed by the proposed gas plant, particularly to children at nearby Woodland Elementary School, located just over a quarter-mile from the site. "These are not things any child should have to worry about," he stated, highlighting the serious implications for community health.

Shelley Robbins, also from the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, reinforced these concerns, detailing the harmful effects of emissions on children's health. She cited research linking air pollution to severe health issues, including asthma and developmental problems, particularly alarming given the proximity of the school to the proposed plant.

As the hearing drew to a close, the overarching sentiment was clear: many community members are calling for a shift away from fossil fuels and a commitment to cleaner energy solutions. The discussions illuminated a critical crossroads for North Carolina's energy future, with advocates urging decision-makers to prioritize public health and environmental sustainability over outdated energy practices. The DEQ's upcoming decisions will not only shape the landscape of energy production in the region but also determine the health and well-being of its residents for generations to come.