Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

CSU audit reveals inconsistencies in Title IX sexual harassment investigations and disciplinary actions

August 31, 2023 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

CSU audit reveals inconsistencies in Title IX sexual harassment investigations and disciplinary actions
A recent joint hearing of the California Legislative Audit Committee and the Assembly and Senate Education Committees highlighted significant concerns regarding the handling of sexual harassment cases within the California State University (CSU) system. The discussions, held on August 31, 2023, focused on an audit that revealed inconsistencies and potential shortcomings in the investigatory processes across various campuses.

One of the primary issues raised was the lack of a standardized review process for sexual harassment allegations. Currently, Title IX coordinators, who often serve as investigators, may not have their determinations reviewed by an independent party. This absence of oversight raises questions about the reliability and fairness of the outcomes for complainants. The auditors emphasized the need for a clearer framework to ensure that all cases are evaluated consistently and thoroughly.

The audit examined 40 cases from 2016 to 2022 and found that none met the federal standards for sexual harassment, despite some allegations appearing severe enough to warrant further investigation. The auditors noted that CSU's own policies set a higher threshold for what constitutes harassment than federal regulations, yet there were still concerns about how these policies were applied in practice.

Several testimonies during the hearing pointed to the emotional toll on complainants, with some expressing dissatisfaction with the handling of their cases. Delays in investigations, some lasting over 200 days, were cited as particularly troubling, leading to feelings of insecurity and frustration among those who reported harassment. The auditors acknowledged anecdotal evidence of complainants feeling unsafe and unsupported throughout the process.

The hearing also touched on the need for timely disciplinary actions following investigations. The auditors found that while some cases were referred for further action, there was often a lack of follow-through, leaving victims without the resolution they sought.

As the CSU system grapples with these findings, the Chancellor's office is urged to take a more active role in establishing clear expectations and standards for handling sexual harassment cases. The discussions underscored the importance of creating a safe and supportive environment for all students and staff, ensuring that allegations are treated with the seriousness they deserve.

The outcomes of this hearing may lead to significant changes in how sexual harassment cases are managed within the CSU system, with the potential for improved protections and support for those who come forward. As the state continues to address these critical issues, the focus remains on fostering a culture of accountability and safety in educational institutions.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal