On August 31, 2023, the California State Assembly convened a joint hearing of the Legislative Audit Committee and the Assembly and Senate Education Committees to address critical issues surrounding sexual misconduct policies within the California State University (CSU) system. The discussions highlighted ongoing concerns about the effectiveness of existing protocols and the need for substantial reforms.

A significant focus of the meeting was the interpretation of sexual misconduct and the ambiguity surrounding its definitions. One committee member expressed deep concern over the varying interpretations of behaviors that could be classified as sexual harassment, citing examples from past presidential conduct. This raised questions about the clarity of training provided to students and staff regarding what constitutes inappropriate behavior. The member emphasized the necessity for annual training to eliminate confusion and ensure that all individuals understand the boundaries of acceptable conduct.

The committee also revisited findings from a 2014 audit, which had identified the need for improved communication regarding complaints of sexual misconduct. Alarmingly, the recent audit echoed these concerns, indicating that little progress had been made in the intervening years. This prompted questions about the CSU's commitment to addressing these issues and the reasons behind the lack of implementation of previous recommendations.

Another critical point of discussion was the cessation of routine Title IX compliance reviews, which had been halted in 2018 due to staffing issues. The committee members questioned the rationale behind this decision and expressed frustration over the continued failure to adhere to federal guidelines designed to protect students and staff from sexual harassment.

The hearing also underscored the need for accountability within the CSU system. Members expressed skepticism about the administration's promises for reform, particularly in light of past failures. They called for more rigorous oversight from the state to ensure that commitments made by CSU leadership are fulfilled. The interim Chancellor assured the committee that specific timelines for implementing the auditor's recommendations would be adhered to, and regular updates would be provided to maintain transparency.

In conclusion, the joint hearing revealed significant gaps in the CSU's handling of sexual misconduct issues, with a clear demand for immediate action and accountability. As the new Chancellor prepares to take office, the committee members emphasized the importance of rebuilding trust with the community and ensuring that the necessary changes are made to protect students and staff from harassment. The discussions set the stage for ongoing scrutiny and potential legislative action aimed at reforming CSU policies and practices.