The University of California Board of Regents convened on November 13, 2024, to address pressing issues affecting students and employees within the UC system. The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding proposed tuition increases and rising healthcare costs, which have sparked widespread discontent among students and staff.

One of the most contentious topics was the potential 9.9 percent tuition hike for non-resident students, a change that could impact nearly one-third of the incoming class at UCLA. Students voiced their frustrations, emphasizing that many are already struggling to meet basic needs due to the high cost of living. Javier Nunez, a UCLA student, articulated that the proposed increase would further jeopardize the ability of international and out-of-state students to afford education, potentially leading to increased debt burdens. He urged the Regents to explore alternative solutions to address the budget deficit without placing additional financial strain on students.

Sherry Zhu, also a UCLA student, echoed these sentiments, criticizing the Regents for approving substantial salary increases for top university officials while considering tuition hikes that would make the UC system less accessible. She called for a focus on student needs, advocating for investments in support services rather than further financial burdens.

In addition to tuition concerns, the meeting addressed significant changes to employee healthcare premiums. Catherine Cobb, president of Teamsters Local 2010, raised alarms about the UC's plan to increase employee healthcare premiums from 9% to 11% starting January 1, 2025. This follows a previous increase from 15% to 19% the prior year. Cobb warned that these rising costs could force employees to forgo necessary medications and healthcare services, exacerbating health issues and undermining the university's commitment to its workforce.

The discussions at the Board of Regents meeting reflect a growing tension between the financial strategies of the UC system and the needs of its students and employees. As the university grapples with budgetary challenges, the voices of those directly affected are calling for a more equitable approach that prioritizes accessibility and support over financial gain for top administrators. The outcome of these discussions will likely shape the future of the UC system and its commitment to serving its diverse community.