The California Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission meeting on October 24, 2024, was marked by intense public comments regarding workplace culture and leadership concerns within the commission. Several speakers voiced serious allegations against Executive Director Toby Ewing, highlighting a troubling environment characterized by bullying and intimidation.
Stacy Hiramoto, representing the Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition, opened the public comment period by expressing frustration over the lack of opportunity for public input, emphasizing that many community members had valuable insights to share. This sentiment was echoed by Andrea, who detailed the negative impact of Ewing's leadership on staff morale and mental health, even linking it to the tragic death of her brother, who had served as chief counsel for the commission. Andrea's comments underscored a belief that the stress from the workplace environment contributed to his health issues.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Further criticism came from Susan Gallagher, Executive Director of Cal Voices, who called for transparency regarding an ongoing investigation into the commission's practices. She expressed concern over Ewing's perceived focus on personal agendas rather than the needs of the community, urging the commission to take a stand against what she described as a culture of fear and retaliation.
Renee, a former director at the commission, shared her own experiences of bullying and harassment under Ewing's leadership, stating that despite her efforts to raise concerns nine years ago, little has changed. She urged the commission to take decisive action to address these issues, advocating for Ewing's termination.
The meeting highlighted a critical moment for the commission as it faces scrutiny over its internal culture and leadership accountability. The public comments reflect a growing demand for change and transparency, emphasizing the need for a supportive environment that prioritizes the mental health of both staff and the communities they serve. As the commission moves forward, the implications of these discussions could significantly impact its operations and public trust.