[{"_1":2,"_136":-5,"_137":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112,124],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6390192,"mediaKeyId","2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250","parentId",2112569,"title","At a glance: Board procedural votes at Parkrose SD 3 work session","audioSeconds",6962,"startMs",99000,"endMs",7061000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=99&end=7061","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_99000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6390192/Oregon/At-a-glance-Board-procedural-votes-at-Parkrose-SD-3-work-session","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390192-91058d510289e6dafabe43c2ad126cf8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=Nj3n6ythetX38yo3f~wQzLjDNh6we3E0WIj0IstDah-LPbt5ks8nMC3j6PxpxT~4jpgMIy2nFOlbuZRu67XIX8XYpX0cRc7nIJDikgNK4E1ziEUCAD41cu93Hu1vj1E3mGEX0ZTCIgBDwW4CCMqG7ma6BjvZI7RSMfxhUpfnMMUu1JNp~fTrI1XNmRI~nAyNtBdrfPeSmhFuJDMkzbwSWzLgYundNDs8gECZ4WsVT3iIlC8xUef0Hb1EnQYaa263uB~WHYYV5UqkhEpiVgNhQn7mqonyThRvxGID8VdnVA5h2sBB1aXzrrSgZLttwuVGwE2fxXGXWEgFIeOAs6W3bg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Parkrose School District 3","date","2025-01-15T09:04:35.433Z","article","The Parkrose SD 3 Board of Education recorded two procedural voice votes during the work session.

1) Agenda approval: At the start of the session the board heard a motion to approve the agenda, received a second and approved the agenda by voice vote. The chair announced “The motion to approve tonight’s agenda passes.” No named mover or second was recorded in the transcript excerpt provided and no roll‑call tally was taken.

2) Mileage and per diem reimbursement rates: Toward the end of the meeting a board member moved to approve updated reimbursement rates for mileage and per diem; a second was called and the motion passed by voice vote. The chair announced the motion “passes.” The transcript records the motion and the voice vote but does not include a roll‑call or an itemized vote record.

Notes: The transcript captures the motions and that both passed; it does not provide named movers/seconders or an itemized roll‑call tally. The district should consult the official minutes and the posted administrative record for an auditable roll‑call if required.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025.01.13 Working Session","oneSentenceSummary","The board approved the meeting agenda and later approved updated reimbursement rates for mileage and per diem during the work session. Both votes were voice votes recorded as passing; no roll‑call tallies were recorded in the transcript.","taxTitle","Parkrose SD 3, School Districts, Oregon","taxId",38719,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6390198,"Parkrose leaders review levy returns and district budget outlook after narrow vote loss",496,5944000,6440000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=5944&end=6440","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_5944000.jpg","/articles/6390198/Oregon/Parkrose-leaders-review-levy-returns-and-district-budget-outlook-after-narrow-vote-loss","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390198-fac80216d5570861384c1aa6f0095515/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=SmU4nADQBSRo79399KNlcApUYRb6hWKtZtJsYLvX79SwdWfzQ7zqSv0T7hKtOy2HNie6taVvpuFyc2adSJYkdUFJ8HVjxqj9~-QHqMMB-pa7ilIJ7PqSBl3TIb56jwcTn3DXgByVC9SBBRExUSq-lbafVid-We8w4wLPQi~-YCQAtAVXJqL23Iyq~Tl2-jeqyBUzxKcfvdrj6ZFI~apcA4sPnS~hUHYvzL5tSY0Zo1Kl144drvw6mxZFyKWCvXRYvYgoy7txQ60ZBFE6A1Sa5S2Kfyd-twHSgbgdn0n3lNDPW6-X4FdvKIisEJ-BgUzCxvqDp4ckAcUHH-yNkPiJSA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","District leaders presented a first look at the recent capital‑levy election returns and provided the board a monthly budget update at the work session, saying the levy failed by a narrow margin and pinpointing precinct turnout and ranked‑choice ballot complexity as contributors.

Election takeaways: staff walked the board through precinct‑level returns, saying some small precincts (for example the area near PDX airport) provided strong yes margins while other precincts with low turnout contributed to the final deficit. Staff flagged that in one precinct Parkrose received a 155‑vote positive margin that materially narrowed the overall loss, while other neighborhood precincts (including the Russell neighborhood) produced negative margins; in total staff highlighted that about 1,113 registered voters in the district did not mark a vote on the levy on the ballot.

Budget notes: the board was shown the monthly board budget; staff explained a difference between totals that include political‑action fundraising costs and totals that exclude those items. Staff said most invoices and encumbrances (printing, OSBA subscriptions, MESD dinner) have been posted or encumbered and that outstanding items are limited in dollar value. A board member asked about levy dollars and the district’s need to catch up on long‑deferred capital items; staff said the district is pursuing grants (including a regional cooperative grant and potential EPA funding) and is discussing the Portland Clean Energy Fund as a potential source for capital work.

Why it matters: staff framed the narrow defeat as informative for future outreach work and urged the board to consider targeted voter turnout strategies; the superintendent said the district will continue to seek grants and other capital resources while planning next steps on facilities priorities.

No board action was taken on capital projects at the meeting; staff said more detailed financial materials will be available for the next business packet.","District staff reviewed precinct‑level levy results that showed the measure failed narrowly, explained turnout and ranked‑choice voting complexity as factors, and provided a monthly budget update noting some encumbrances and contract payments.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6390203,"Board briefed on ICE/immigration protocol; district emphasizes sanctuary protections and supports for families",430,6533000,6963000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=6533&end=6963","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_6533000.jpg","/articles/6390203/Oregon/Board-briefed-on-ICEimmigration-protocol-district-emphasizes-sanctuary-protections-and-supports-for-families","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390203-8a13c1109710047812cf1f4fadf69214/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=BYPJKD5Ph~k7-~r4suRuH5GSQBddooB2ukF8oR~cAGcafM-Zt4pCB6S4W9fGu2xYQ7eY4RVjJyuZ5IIoebnTrZKLUCjAM6eoaQNJzRabCvQJj~ZvAqzJe5xoxloisYwpCCT~blBvMHH0zBDl6NDGCPgwy-U96~1wE1FySyBmrFz1BvnsqsAt85VcCLdqZlikqVLVi75AtUkQNRIEUIANkmk2HQk6yXP1lR7BfE51Tg9nVuct6CUH43hVSrz01bFthKpjZ6SCUFfWSUUgUlFr1ZSAwiscUZi51~2~AnqIO2i-zyvPomrgrcBTUCiCEzJRktSrVqe2-A9TwM4tkyRcpg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","District leaders presented an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protocol at the Parkrose SD 3 work session and reiterated that Oregon’s sanctuary‑promise law and district direction generally restrict enforcement agents from school grounds unless they present a warrant.

Staff said district practice is to route student information requests through the superintendent’s office, to deny entry by enforcement agents who lack a warrant, and to protect a student’s right to attend school regardless of immigration status. The presentation noted that directory information remains public under law and that the district must follow formal processes for records requests.

Officials acknowledged community concerns about workplace raids and other enforcement activity that can leave children without caregivers; staff said they are coordinating with regional partners to identify resources and “know your rights” legal clinics and to prepare district responses when families face these circumstances. The superintendent urged proactivity in providing resources and communications so families and staff know where to go for legal help and how the district intends to respond.

Board members asked about operational details for public events, bus stops and after‑school activities; staff said they would continue outreach and provide materials in multiple languages and that the district will share event‑safety guidance and partner resources for immigrant families.

No formal policy vote was taken at the work session; staff said the protocol is intended as operational guidance for employees and would be implemented in coordination with partners.","District leaders presented an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protocol reaffirming Oregon’s sanctuary‑promise obligations, limiting enforcement access to school premises absent a warrant, and noting supports and community legal resources for families who may be affected.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6390209,"Superintendent frames artificial‑intelligence policy as a ‘tinker and learn’ task for district",1717,3683000,5400000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=3683&end=5400","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_3683000.jpg","/articles/6390209/Oregon/Superintendent-frames-artificialintelligence-policy-as-a-tinker-and-learn-task-for-district","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390209-9f3edc6fd6d7ad713b10569245b6e5cd/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=UqgEP0xPC9EhOMv7thqWq9a2aHbL0AJy5SoIbHXoiqXVP-tyzompsbsHdViGCbNrlGeYTd19c06yfaY0ca0iF8Cx6lcfdwT1NgDzumt1BxYx1QT4D65C1VXIT2jcKPxmkki4bdNMdMnAmNQiNqAoNw~DYXC2CAxatrb6bSdeYDU5TgMk-tXm9jL15EEgQU-fZxh2qydSVarjPSWDf-7hcleAtOWOufS-ctOLqKaN1i10DgcHPNtp87dOCJBXD3~ML7XOJhXA7JAPICu0U3GtlSp2-a05-Lb7fGeTOw3mGNCvZhbG6tfYDsC~Xk-X~FnK77XZXT1QxWKs~5Fdnlg3Ug__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Parkrose SD 3 superintendent framed artificial intelligence as a fast‑moving classroom issue and urged the board to treat initial district policy on AI as the start of an iterative process that allows staff time to experiment and build professional capacity.

In an extended presentation, the superintendent described common AI classroom uses—personalized learning, automated feedback, rubric generation and intelligent tutoring—and gave examples of tools currently available to staff and students, including Google Gemini and ChatGPT. The superintendent said staff use cases already include using AI to categorize open‑ended student interview data and to create rubrics and formative feedback more quickly. She also cautioned about bias in models, privacy concerns, workload for staff learning the tools, and the possibility that free tools will later become paid products.

Board members asked about cheating, teaching practice changes and equity. The superintendent said she did not favor blanket bans and that schools should teach students how to use AI responsibly; she suggested shifting assignments toward in‑class demonstrations of student knowledge and designing tasks that require authentic student work rather than take‑home essays that can be generated by large language models.

Staff recommended pilot projects, summer professional development, and student involvement in policy design. No formal policy was adopted; the presentation was framed as an initial briefing the board will revisit as staff develop draft policy language and training plans.","The district superintendent opened a broad discussion on how artificial intelligence (AI) may affect instruction, assessment and staff development, urging the board to allow time for staff to experiment with tools and to prioritize training before formal policy adoption.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6390214,"Parkrose staff outline six‑year curriculum cycle, pilots and professional‑development plans",514,1846000,2360000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=1846&end=2360","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_1846000.jpg","/articles/6390214/Oregon/Parkrose-staff-outline-sixyear-curriculum-cycle-pilots-and-professionaldevelopment-plans","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390214-8b4bd1917177c72ed76b73d3b0fda34d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=M-pHfjO~vCzGCqqfIyMMo712K-46kokj4MsbR3ZO~ilyeuFj3wUfI0p0uUwvGlFCJbu0AC~gWCI4a2cXF3VDsLdUpuUv7flcisKG37n60-senAQAbPtatL~8xdCTVrFHv4fl4qJv5KuKZxGWssbZu6XdPuvk3HOuHJVL8JP9UhDBvSl6fvZeu~YotupESG43LpbYLxbcyN-Lsv1vIjv8fvyA0cIQt4vWNEZu9SrxxAHc2xj138pM7fDm3edMbnKZ5pPACyCoHnqK3yxDjXt~MtC2O8NXUsdf1UndX58oc8DxQR5KKP9pu2cpaU6dkzNrp43SLvBBVnrLxXeoTwA51Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","District staff described the Parkrose SD 3 curriculum‑adoption process at the work session, laying out a multi‑phase approach that screens vendor materials, pilots selected units with teachers and students, and funds professional development for full implementation.

The process: staff said they form a District Curriculum Adoption Committee (DCAC) made up of district and building‑level teachers and content experts; use state resources (ODE and MESB) and vendor caravans for initial screening; narrow materials to one to three candidate curricula; pilot units in classrooms and survey students and teachers; then present a recommended adoption to the board for approval followed by purchases and professional development.

Timeline and examples: staff said Parkrose runs a roughly six‑year rotation; math adoption work for grades 6–12 has taken nearly two years. The high school has used an “independent adoption” approach while the district tested Amplify and Desmos as potential secondary math curricula. Science, health and world‑language adoption windows were shown on a multi‑year slide, with health targeted for 2026 and social studies in a subsequent year.

Budget and constraints: staff and the superintendent told the board that curriculum materials are expensive and the district often negotiates multi‑year payment plans with publishers. Board members asked about workbook usage and costs; staff said past analysis showed only about 15% of workbooks were actually used in some adoptions and this shaped future purchasing decisions.

Why it matters: staff emphasized that pilot phases include student feedback on representation, readability and barriers, and that the district tries to learn from nearby larger districts’ early adoption experiences. Board members asked for more time to evaluate neighboring districts’ outcomes before implementation and for clearer cost implications to be included in future adoption packets.

Next steps: staff said recommended materials and associated professional development will be brought back to the board after screening and pilot phases are complete, and that district leaders are planning for multi‑year budgeting of adoption costs rather than single‑year purchases.","District staff described a multi‑phase curriculum adoption process—screening, piloting, professional development—and a roughly six‑year rotation for subject adoptions; math adoption for secondary grades is still underway with pilot work planned.",{"_33":125,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":126,"_41":127,"_43":128,"_45":129,"_47":130,"_49":131,"_51":132,"_53":133,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":134,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":135,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6390218,"Parkrose presentation outlines revised material-selection and reconsideration policies as challenges rise",851,195000,1046000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250&start=195&end=1046","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2112569-5899d7684bc0e3e19a5a241159b74250/thumbnail_195000.jpg","/articles/6390218/Oregon/Parkrose-presentation-outlines-revised-material-selection-and-reconsideration-policies-as-challenges-rise","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6390218-9bf3a8c95dd5f288e8b55fb6c755c852/orig.mp4?Expires=1775671017&Signature=QudI4fwTeSujJnKSvtR1Ni2OnLsmaIoC~tB0InrhUoExuRpgucaiudj-SUH8jGnGQdtRhuuohWYM8TYmQpeD6QYbeP~EfQsBoErcov44wqrE8TLSr5K~GowsKTijhD8xadBcetKDr~ONI884QMafpq0bHnQn2YehEvqOVOE6LuGN2F4Hgu6g2b8WqWlDjZJM8T9NzDTlDfy8Y9PijeSMygeFNOUSc3H3KUd4iEfye-TwCgG6-ErhO6y20Dy1MBmeT3eC8C0em0gonfihx7BX0D54SKrdOGYD9evxzEz0RvKOKVP2QlsmIF1jICmcxDQq1kytA3xSD9fywNr~C8USZg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Parkrose School District 3 media specialist presented revisions to the district’s material-selection policy and a new reconsideration process during the board work session, saying recent years have brought a sharp rise in requests to remove titles from school libraries.

The presentation highlighted why the policies matter, cited national data from the American Library Association (ALA) showing a large increase in unique titles challenged since 2020, and described local steps to increase access to books in Spanish, Russian and Vietnamese. The district’s proposed selection policy explicitly recognizes “potentially controversial topics” as part of a curriculum and collection meant to present multiple perspectives, the presenter said. The proposed reconsideration form would require challengers to suggest an alternative of “equal merit,” limit who may file reconsideration requests, and establish a multi‑member committee – including an administrator, teachers, students, a librarian and parents – to review challenges in a timely way.

Why it matters: the presenter said targeted challenges have disproportionately focused on titles representing LGBTQIA and BIPOC voices nationally and that those requests impose heavy workload demands on districts when committees are convened to review books. The new local steps are designed both to protect collection integrity and to provide a pathway for families to request that a specific student not check out particular titles.

Key points from the presentation included that the district has not received any formal reconsideration requests to date, only informal inquiries; that the library increased high‑school circulation by 21% and middle‑school circulation by 145% since 2023 after a major “weeding” of outdated stock; and that district librarians are partnering with the Multnomah County Library System’s School Corps to borrow language‑appropriate materials the district cannot yet afford to buy.

Board members and audience members asked about local challenge volumes and whether individual parental requests could be honored without removing access for all students. The presenter said parents can request that a student be steered away from a particular title or lesson and that staff will provide alternate materials “of equal literary merit” when feasible. The presenter and a board member emphasized that limiting who can file formal challenges helps keep reconsiderations rooted in the local community rather than driven by outside actors.

The presentation closed with thanks to staff who drafted the policy language and a request that the board consider the revisions in future action packets. No formal vote on the policies took place at the work session; the superintendent noted OSBA (Oregon School Boards Association) had issued late guidance regarding some Title IX–related language and that the district would review OSBA’s notice before taking final action on related policies.

Board members and staff said they intend to continue outreach about the district collection-development work and to bring finalized policy language back for consideration at a later meeting.","District librarians presented revised library material-selection and reconsideration policies, described rising national challenges to books since 2020, and outlined local steps to expand multilingual collections and formalize procedures for handling challenges.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

At a glance: Board procedural votes at Parkrose SD 3 work session

Parkrose leaders review levy returns and district budget outlook after narrow vote loss

Board briefed on ICE/immigration protocol; district emphasizes sanctuary protections and supports for families

Superintendent frames artificial‑intelligence policy as a ‘tinker and learn’ task for district

Parkrose staff outline six‑year curriculum cycle, pilots and professional‑development plans

Parkrose presentation outlines revised material-selection and reconsideration policies as challenges rise