[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6688344,"mediaKeyId","2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b","parentId",2107799,"title","Residents raise safety concerns on 55100 South; staff says UDOT plans four-way stop and sidewalk funding discussions ongoing","audioSeconds",145,"startMs",3780000,"endMs",3925000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b&start=3780&end=3925","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b/thumbnail_3780000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6688344/Utah/Residents-raise-safety-concerns-on-55100-South-staff-says-UDOT-plans-four-way-stop-and-sidewalk-funding-discussions-ongoing","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6688344-0c198c865629718628c91c1c23d2353f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775798233&Signature=Ui7KCz7bJAzgyKDUqqW7c7QXfWu3CwUoEGTNFMEl8lA3cLctGD2KeSJ8-f~H5OEUELdtRfQjQ28pKg7pcfVtIgXiBOELNNNr4a2mxBCCADbo7hZdWidOzJHdGSLS48-~pGPAF~9ucoLgRjdyozKp3-XhDw6Ju-UGKqxWxr77DUCnF7sJJali~bou7yubzTNGBmkk0cJkhmJSr6yJFehBADop6LSFtF7HdqOdiJ1KSOhClJfj7l92nSQ6l1qyA60XQXGV9IEigrNrhpZY9runU2mkuU2krq2U2mXaToG93kZgfWAmZOOddP5Wb3xbZ~KJSgajKohCX4iL8Pi4-vFksw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Hooper City","date","2025-01-13T17:09:27.39Z","article","Neighbors at the meeting raised concerns about traffic safety and missing sidewalks along 55100 South, a state highway that runs through parts of Hooper City. Several residents described multiple accidents at the intersection near a local dance studio and asked the commission to pursue a four-way stop and sidewalks.

Planning staff told residents that UDOT has approved a four-way stop at the intersection and that the department is looking at speed limits and possible turning-lane or signal improvements. Staff also said there is an existing grant that covers improvements from Sinclair to the Davis County line and that the city is exploring additional funding for sidewalks, including coordination with the local school on a school-safety funding program.

One resident asked who to contact for updates and was directed to the city website and Utah’s public-meetings portal to review agendas and recordings. Staff said they would follow up on the precise timing and any active improvement projects and would coordinate with UDOT and the city council as needed.

Why it matters: 55100 South is a state road; safety improvements and sidewalk additions require coordination among Hooper City, UDOT and, where applicable, school and county authorities. Residents requested clearer timelines and permanent pedestrian infrastructure to reduce crash risk.

Next steps: Staff said it would continue to coordinate with UDOT on the four-way stop and pursuit of sidewalk funding and would follow up on the timeline and grant opportunities.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","January 9, 2025 - Planning Commission Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","During public comment, residents urged action on safety and sidewalks along 55100 South; staff said UDOT has approved a four-way stop at a key intersection and staff are pursuing sidewalk funding with UDOT and the local school.","taxTitle","Hooper City Council, Hooper , Weber County, Utah","taxId",21280,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6688346,"Planning commission tables review of Title 10 changes, allowed uses and fines to give new members time to review",4969,1232000,6201000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b&start=1232&end=6201","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b/thumbnail_1232000.jpg","/articles/6688346/Utah/Planning-commission-tables-review-of-Title-10-changes-allowed-uses-and-fines-to-give-new-members-time-to-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6688346-6dbe2ab8919207f12ee0feb52b2ee5c6/orig.mp4?Expires=1775798233&Signature=DXihxKDZ8fDKo09oz7MHBP8f8K8m5sBHrNn1CiYJGu9~S6WV6dwtl6XdtVjEcY83waEcop4T41cqa0ocVRgfWXjrPAkMyIAvbblML2mOvRUJmjuNr6PRKBXkhg31MLdiNVRXMqTbxVMrA~RgwrSlzKCFPKKhJZMrwZDl1Yf0-zaGlPES4ygFhXRcN9C6lwplsTTr4CAdK~tjOruLi9PK9xXho4Xf4pjXEfqcG6EUaErqmMu3R8~qOR1wHnVGGCuXqJ6B1xpAYiATA13gUYkKrFBfljxBX121w7Rwstrcx3iWp7O~lBYaDG6COTo84IBvft0mYszPpSagsqx-rPzSJA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooper City Planning Commission voted to table further action on proposed revisions to Title 10 (the city’s land-use code), a review of allowed uses (including treatment facilities and cell-tower siting), and an update to fines and fees until the commission’s next meeting to give newly appointed members time to study the packet and earlier testimony.

Staff noted the Title 10 update is tied to state legislation passed in 2023 that changed the subdivision approval process; the update will also implement a technical-review-committee (TRC) role and clarify procedures staff will use for subdivision and land-use reviews. Staff said it will present the updated subdivision ordinance and comparisons with the current code to city council on Jan. 16 and will return to the commission with more detailed discussion and a work session.

Commissioners said the allowed-uses list needs clearer definitions for specific uses that had generated controversy in prior meetings, including drug- and alcohol-treatment facilities and children’s treatment facilities. Staff read the current definition in the packet for “children’s treatment facility” and noted the earlier hearing drew testimony from law enforcement, treatment providers and neighbors; several participants recommended distance limits from schools and day cares and caps on bed counts. “All of them that spoke have said that they did not feel like they should be next to an elementary school,” staff said of earlier public testimony.

On fines and fees, staff said existing penalties (in some cases small administrative fines) have not produced compliance in prior enforcement cases. The packet included comparative research from other cities; staff proposed higher fines and other enforcement tools but recommended commissioners take time to form suggestions. Commissioners voted to table formal action and asked staff to circulate the prior meeting recording, the packet, and any appeal status for the recent drug- and alcohol-treatment conditional use permit so commissioners could review prior testimony before deciding on code language and enforcement levels.

Why it matters: changes to Title 10 and to the allowed-uses schedule can alter where specific land uses (for example treatment facilities or cell towers) are permitted, affect proximity to schools and day cares, and change enforcement power available to staff. Those rule changes affect developers, operators and neighbors.

Next steps: Staff will circulate materials and return to the commission at the February meeting (staff identified February 5 as the anticipated public-hearing/meeting date for the ordinance-change notice). The commission asked staff to confirm whether any pending appeals remain active and to provide a list of recommended regulatory changes and supporting research.","Commissioners agreed to postpone final action on proposed Title 10 (land-use) revisions and a recommended update to allowed uses and fines; staff will return materials and a presentation in February so new commissioners can review definitions and prior testimony.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6688348,"Planning commission approves two oversized-structure conditional use permits",160,2798000,2958000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b&start=2798&end=2958","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b/thumbnail_2798000.jpg","/articles/6688348/Utah/Planning-commission-approves-two-oversized-structure-conditional-use-permits","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6688348-a851c75b2b311b61211ad2f9ba3c05f1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775798233&Signature=BNS3lOzZPt-EeYoU~gf4W9DAm-ZwwrQVH4i51xAsijDU9BPxz0QFHfLp1cfqjxLDiRCj~IGbLX5G0kCwUQojgxZ7mMVMr14IK-jH-BWyROuc6H9UR7lCvVCVDb1Miv2G3PFKz7bm0vTRt24fDkwx50x5NZns3K4YZqWlKQc88eCP7ocpk3sPuJBE6UtzIWuUrfJQGLkjiOqTQwLU~LNtFefidnsn1H42BPHuEl8rje2SdHpkU-EyOo~K~HP6jOmrfh2P~H26JAiYBkqMXEJx1Shijcf6esqgUy7cpEvT7-WJt-QVGIXKhAJO3gzd72N0epM2xMoP~HEeAV8HRKZnGA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooper City Planning Commission approved conditional use permits for two oversized accessory structures at addresses listed in the meeting packet, finding both proposals met applicable setback and height standards under the city’s current code.

Staff highlighted that the first application, from Tanner Schmidt, requested a total of 3,720 square feet (including an awning correction noted in the application packet). Staff said the structure will be used for personal storage, will include electricity and a water line but no sewer, and will meet required setbacks. Schmidt told the commission the space is for “personal storage” and not for a business.

The second approval was for Jacob Johnson, who sought an approximately 3,200-square-foot oversized structure for storage and a workshop. Staff said the proposed building met the RO-zone setbacks (20-foot rear, 10-foot side) and was under the 25-foot height threshold; the applicant said the building was intended to clean up yard storage and provide a workshop space.

In both cases, the commission took public testimony (no members of the public spoke against either application) and then moved to approve the permits. Motions were made and seconded; the chair called for votes, and multiple “Aye” responses were recorded and the motions were announced as passed. The transcript records the motions and approvals but does not contain a named roll-call tally for each vote; the official minutes will contain the formal vote record.

Why it matters: Conditional use permits for oversized accessory structures change what property owners may build and where; approvals set precedents for setback and utility conditions planners will apply to similar future requests.

Next steps: Staff will finalize permit paperwork and proceed with building-permit reviews and inspections as required. The commission noted plumbing-related considerations for sewer connections when plumbing is proposed in accessory structures.","The commission approved conditional use permits for oversized accessory structures for applicants Tanner Schmidt and Jacob Johnson, both described as personal storage/workshop uses; staff confirmed setbacks and utilities concerns were addressed.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6688350,"Hooper City Planning Commission elects new chair and vice chair after debate over timing",352,2259000,2611000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b&start=2259&end=2611","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2107799-834786f2a732ad2d5ab33745053f549b/thumbnail_2259000.jpg","/articles/6688350/Utah/Hooper-City-Planning-Commission-elects-new-chair-and-vice-chair-after-debate-over-timing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6688350-847101918217532fcd8b4c107cd8d1b5/orig.mp4?Expires=1775798233&Signature=CbSoP1LO6laoiGT7byDMwSXjJ~Jc9GTrPeRSI7R18ePVmk8x2XcqPQfiKN4WpxP9YHCvCraJZ0Q0Ouy2FOwMenqlIRjwKvRfCBvQ7jvTAZjm6GwMn4gsPz6FU8LybXbBkAssI6KsN0xIOU0KWaez49HliN-WwUctkiKSDoRdk17HZOicboNCeLvdvEQt9geVF3~dVUjpOKBepXsTMP-8f1cVtARqpgN89AkNvwb1MpDSEyZBkF~DrlMepn9ehtZ5dW3hJJeI1ZUIBQpGNl-o99PCd1YFCO3koA-tknXdxYQbCK0Z2V9WgkACYen4KW9U7IfFZ8CM1BOyj3AhqA3Ejg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners on the Hooper City Planning Commission elected Commissioner McCormick as chair and Commissioner Woodison as vice chair during the meeting, voting to confirm both appointments after a brief but at-times heated discussion about whether to delay the selections until more members were seated.

The commission’s staff member said the council had discussed expanding the commission from five to seven members and that a public hearing and council action would be required to change the ordinance; some commissioners urged waiting until that process was complete. “I was just trying to follow the same protocol and give the same respect to the commissioners,” a commissioner said when explaining a preference to wait until a full commission could decide. Others replied that the commission’s rules call for electing officers at the first meeting and moved to proceed.

After members proposed and seconded nominations, the commission voted and the appointments passed; the roll-call style voting in the transcript was recorded as multiple “Aye” responses and the chair announced the motions passed. No individual vote tallies by name were available in the record; the meeting minutes will show official vote counts.

Why it matters: the chair runs the commission meetings and represents the planning commission to staff and city council. Commissioners debated whether selecting officers now would preempt council action to expand the panel to seven members and to reopen applications for any new seats.

The commission also discussed related procedural items during the same meeting — including how and when to approve minutes from the prior meeting, and whether the chair should have a regular vote — and staff and the city attorney advised members on the limits and customary practice under Hooper City code. The city attorney said there is no ordinance prohibition on the chair voting and that the commission could allow the chair to vote if it wished.

Next steps: The commission will continue operating under the newly chosen chair and vice chair while staff coordinates with the city council on any ordinance changes to expand membership and on a public-notice schedule if the council decides to open additional seats.","The Hooper City Planning Commission voted to appoint Commissioner McCormick as chair and Commissioner Woodison as vice chair after discussion about whether to wait for a full seven-member commission and pending ordinance changes.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Residents raise safety concerns on 55100 South; staff says UDOT plans four-way stop and sidewalk funding discussions ongoing

Planning commission tables review of Title 10 changes, allowed uses and fines to give new members time to review

Planning commission approves two oversized-structure conditional use permits

Hooper City Planning Commission elects new chair and vice chair after debate over timing