The Louisiana Board of Pardons and Parole convened on December 18, 2024, to conduct a hearing regarding a pardon application. The meeting featured testimonies from both supporters and opponents of the applicant, who is seeking to have his criminal record cleared.

The session began with the applicant's defense, where family members and community leaders spoke in favor of his character and rehabilitation. Selena Mejia, the applicant's sister-in-law, highlighted his positive contributions to the community and his ongoing commitment to personal growth and education over the past several years. She emphasized that he has remained a supportive figure for his family and community despite the challenges he has faced.

Anthony Ponton, a former law enforcement officer, also testified, noting the applicant's transformation and his role as a mentor to younger individuals in the community. Ponton expressed confidence in the applicant's ability to positively influence others and contribute to society, stating that he has demonstrated significant personal growth since his conviction.

Another supporter, identified as Mr. Burge, praised the applicant's leadership qualities and his dedication to bettering himself and his community. He argued that the applicant's integrity and character have shown through his actions post-incarceration, and he urged the board to consider the applicant's potential for continued positive impact.

However, the hearing also included poignant opposition from the victim's family. Chris Hugh, the father of a child who lost his life due to the applicant's actions, delivered a heartfelt statement expressing his grief and the lasting impact of the tragedy on his family. He articulated the pain of losing his son and the fear that the applicant could return to law enforcement, which he felt would undermine the justice served.

Kathy Martis, the victim's grandmother, echoed these sentiments, sharing her personal connection to the victim and her disbelief at the applicant's expression of remorse. She questioned the sincerity of the applicant's claims and highlighted the ongoing emotional toll on the victim's family.

The meeting concluded with a clear divide between the testimonies of support and opposition, reflecting the complex emotions surrounding the case. The board will deliberate on the application, weighing the arguments presented by both sides before making a decision on the pardon request.