In a solemn meeting held on December 17, 2024, the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Parole convened to hear the case of Bradley Wax, a man seeking a pardon and restoration of his firearm rights after a conviction for obscenity in 2015. The atmosphere was charged with emotion as Wax, accompanied by his attorney Keith Couture and his wife Sherry, presented his case to the board.

Wax, who was sentenced to three years of hard labor—suspended in favor of probation—spoke candidly about the impact of his conviction on his life and family. He described the circumstances surrounding his case, which stemmed from a larger investigation involving his son. Wax emphasized his acceptance of responsibility, stating, “I just took responsibility for the action, basically.” He expressed a deep desire to move past this chapter of his life, citing a quote from author Maria Robinson: “You can’t go back to the beginning and start over. You can begin now, create a new ending.”

Throughout the hearing, Wax articulated the challenges he faced due to his felony conviction, including barriers to employment in fields like healthcare, where he had pursued nursing. He highlighted his commitment to community service, including volunteering at a humane society, and underscored his belief that he poses no risk to society. “I’m about the surest thing to them,” he asserted, advocating for his ability to contribute positively to his community.

Couture, Wax’s attorney, reinforced this message, stating that Wax has maintained an excellent record since his conviction and has shown no signs of reoffending. He urged the board to consider Wax’s age and the long process of rehabilitation he has undergone since the incident.

However, the board faced opposition from the 22nd Judicial District Attorney’s office and the local sheriff, who maintained a policy of opposition to such applications. Despite this, Wax’s wife passionately defended him, sharing the toll the conviction has taken on their family and her husband’s character. “He is a stellar husband, exceptional father,” she said, imploring the board to recognize the man she knows beyond the charges.

As the meeting concluded, the board members prepared to deliberate on Wax’s application, weighing the emotional testimonies against the legal and societal implications of granting a pardon. The outcome remains uncertain, but the hearing highlighted the complexities of redemption and the enduring impact of past mistakes on individuals and their families.