[{"_1":2,"_110":-5,"_111":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_25":26},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_27":28,"_29":30},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[31,74,86,98],{"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":39,"_40":41,"_42":43,"_44":45,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":55,"_73":55},"mediaId",6384844,"mediaKeyId","2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87","parentId",2121058,"title","Neighborhood District 1 elects new chair, vice chairs and secretary at quarterly meeting","audioSeconds",90,"startMs",3260000,"endMs",3350000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87&start=3260&end=3350","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87/thumbnail_3260000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6384844/Utah/Neighborhood-District-1-elects-new-chair-vice-chairs-and-secretary-at-quarterly-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384844-f57637454cee9729e4d34babaa48d0b4/orig.mp4?Expires=1769869753&Signature=XZlAr96BK0xo4Rwo97XmPbAKKwI7Y3lnUNEoih0uN4Pcga1B8KulAhThhRcUxWg9wLY3KpMVW-I3HDwHqvdDL5SulLBNIs6JsW2zG9ANPnq9zXw2EWyzWJRMrn0VLzK5X0MZRNE2GAZUoRE2RJr91jQCfvSMCgEHObhh8yky9LHkyVgyAWl59U11j5nWOtzXZH1UtbYFWwkTrSdUwDjRvNiRsxkbSfJKp9i4d~tC8IufihgQ0oUMiJ1AOBUKwGNdKi3Aa~PRFFUFYMGpN~nOq8pwTtkFh47qXONS83ZgJ~MfWLWdNTa9Qj7MgfAtMsDfB4e7kJKkhueVQVcCWDfAVg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-01-16T03:30:22Z","article","Neighborhood District 1 members voted to confirm leadership for 2025 at the district’s quarterly meeting. Matthew Will Wright volunteered to run for chair, Paul volunteered for a vice-chair position, and Becca volunteered to serve as secretary; a motion to confirm the slate was moved and seconded and approved by voice vote.

Meeting organizers asked board members to confirm who would serve in roles so neighborhood operations could proceed. After the motion and second, the chair called for those in favor and recorded no opposition. A board member asked whether the chair would be able to attend meetings regularly given work conflicts; the meeting organizer replied Wright had a known scheduling conflict on one meeting but would generally attend.

The newly confirmed officers will take on standard duties for the neighborhood board, including coordinating meeting agendas and facilitating resident engagement. The board also discussed meeting frequency (quarterly) and noted upcoming city-hosted events in January and February.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Neighborhood District 1 Meeting 01/15/2025","oneSentenceSummary","District 1 confirmed Matthew Will Wright as chair, two vice chairs (including Paul) and Becca as secretary in a formal motion and voice vote; the board also set meeting cadence and discussed officer duties.","taxTitle","Provo City Other, Provo, Utah County, Utah","taxId",66233,"location","Utah","headline","shortSummary",{"_32":75,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":76,"_40":77,"_42":78,"_44":79,"_46":80,"_48":81,"_50":82,"_52":83,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":84,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":85,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":55,"_73":55},6384847,"Provo neighborhood traffic studies prompt speed-feedback sign proposals and matching-grant plans",1503,3446000,4949000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87&start=3446&end=4949","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87/thumbnail_3446000.jpg","/articles/6384847/Utah/Provo-neighborhood-traffic-studies-prompt-speed-feedback-sign-proposals-and-matching-grant-plans","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384847-2a48ae60f6274651398967763103f77c/orig.mp4?Expires=1769869753&Signature=igWeK47AwQoQvgyhLTNPzTruD9~y8fifbE0ZPjWC5l7rrxQg5e2tt9aGs3C22-UZUL-GKlRyoOszycifvavq7nP4q73TMzo5BHbxdaRg7YAGhz-cV~DUHXajbNybxjHSwUwqnuzsuVyOYyGk-tmzl~jWvF7~~FA~TQEX4oVBcYw-zN6vhdvPjEkW-s05tSIKDDubBpi-rrtL6uPMeuUc80UPJyIu8OsjOGQ56DjWPEs7xEUI~S7FpumEL1bwuPhqFjjteXjWuIFd5dQ7uM8eVrPLGgHqARrzi2YSCFUJYqQgcOipn87Ng0D09PqLdfaa1Wzf0~mi0DN2guQIgMl-hg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City traffic studies presented to Neighborhood District 1 showed recurring issues with speeding on several local streets and arterials, and residents asked the board to pursue matching grants to fund permanent speed-feedback signs.

Rachel, the neighborhood coordinator for Provo City, presented speed and crash data compiled from traffic-monitoring locations sent by Vern, the city traffic manager. For 22100 North, Rachel said the posted speed limit was 30 mph, the average measured speed was 36 mph and the 85th percentile speed was 45 mph; the study recorded multiple crashes (19–23 crashes reported for the 2021–2023 window depending on cutoffs). For smaller local streets such as 346 North and Foothill Drive, monitoring showed average speeds above posted limits and occasional drivers recorded at 50–70 mph.

Residents proposed two matching-grant applications to buy permanent driver-feedback signs. Richard, a neighborhood resident, requested a sign on eastbound 22100 North near schools and said the location has \"the highest volume on any street in the neighborhood\" (about 8,922 vehicles per day cited in his slides). Another resident asked for a sign on 2950 (29/50) where parents and students cross; staff noted the radar trailer deployment helps while temporary but that a permanent sign provides longer-term mitigation.

Board members discussed the matching-grant process: service hours (volunteer work such as spring cleanups, landscaping visible from the street) are used to match city funds and must be completed by June 30 (end of fiscal year). Rachel said the district has some remaining service hours from a previous project and that one proposed sign (Quail Run area) has a committed matching-grant applicant (Meredith) and is expected to be installed in January.

The board signaled support for pursuing Richard's application and for the other resident’s project; decisions were by show-of-hands during the meeting and residents were encouraged to begin applications and plan service activities early in the calendar/fiscal year.","Traffic monitoring in multiple District 1 streets showed speeds above posted limits in several locations; residents and staff proposed using neighborhood matching grants and service hours to obtain permanent \"Your Speed\" driver feedback signs and other safety measures.",{"_32":87,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":88,"_40":89,"_42":90,"_44":91,"_46":92,"_48":93,"_50":94,"_52":95,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":96,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":97,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":55,"_73":55},6384854,"Provo planners outline ADU rules, change paths to approval; Pleasant View remains only area in District 1 where ADUs are allowed by right",325,1513000,1838000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87&start=1513&end=1838","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87/thumbnail_1513000.jpg","/articles/6384854/Utah/Provo-planners-outline-ADU-rules-change-paths-to-approval-Pleasant-View-remains-only-area-in-District-1-where-ADUs-are-allowed-by-right","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384854-5b1f98a297a96f2c9a2319071d0aa79c/orig.mp4?Expires=1769869753&Signature=fnhrB5IiMDHqmtiVx01kcPVOj9GCu0T8C4NrpNb9K-PBXTqJIN7BJbrH502DDmN7-egmXypJoqvYT0liqQw-0nNoRrFYuTuLW1urL1YuZgDvmwF48XJHS487TJEzh99o6O2-o-g~ADWqCXPjOupXXzJ0psN2A1rKKLMdCSoLHn5pLZKDvAYXCf8LY7Q2nXEu-tflD2naR3LlVCtLM2zM9fU6T~Wr~qyo-Gu9dT-zeYeKpCwnPoZAy7HeDkCpg-dayZcptHxfAfeI~ZvfoVuM2sG369sZ8yvH6nO18B5Jt9jWIKEvCkLv2FfL8hXF1hZL7NnF6t1K3EA0-LfvBf~vPQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Malia, a staff member in the Provo City council office, presented an overview of the city’s accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules and recent ordinance changes to Neighborhood District 1. \"This is found in our city code, chapter 14.30,\" she said, and noted the code treats attached, detached and internal ADUs the same for regulatory purposes.

Malia walked attendees through where ADUs are prohibited and where they are allowed by right: much of the city’s low-density residential zones prohibit ADUs, while a set of mapped areas (shown in staff slides) allow them by right. She said that within District 1, Pleasant View is the only neighborhood where ADUs are allowed by right by zoning. For properties outside those mapped zones, Malia explained three pathways to obtain an ADU: (1) an ordinance text amendment with neighbor signatures (which now reduces the fee from $1,000 to $500 but still requires council approval), (2) a rezoning of the property into a zone that allows ADUs, or (3) the now-eliminated special-use permit pathway that previously allowed some ADUs without council action (staff said that pathway was removed by council action and no longer exists).

Malia also summarized grandfathering and owner-occupancy rules. She said ADUs that were previously permitted under older special permits remain valid while the original owner occupies the home and complies with the rental-dwelling license and safety inspections; if the owner moves or sells, that permit does not run with the land. She clarified ADUs require owner-occupancy: \"As soon as the person who owns the home is not living in that home, it's technically not the ADU anymore,\" she said. A community member asked whether family members could reside in an ADU; Malia said family occupancy is allowed under the code’s family definition.

Residents asked practical questions about how to identify immediate adjacent properties for signature petitions, the process for reporting suspected illegal ADUs (call 311 or submit an online code-enforcement complaint), and the one-time $50 fee for the elderly-special-use permit path. Malia said all ADU-related approvals require final council approval when applying via ordinance or rezoning.","Council staff summarized recent changes to Provo’s accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules, described zoning map areas where ADUs are allowed by right, and explained three pathways for homeowners to gain ADU approval; neighborhood residents asked enforcement and eligibility questions.",{"_32":99,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":100,"_40":101,"_42":102,"_44":103,"_46":104,"_48":105,"_50":106,"_52":107,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":108,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":109,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":55,"_73":55},6384858,"Provo council office outlines draft noise ordinance changes; residents press on stadium exemptions",611,882000,1493000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87&start=882&end=1493","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121058-c164aa6c9d4374c1f5b1283562799b87/thumbnail_882000.jpg","/articles/6384858/Utah/Provo-council-office-outlines-draft-noise-ordinance-changes-residents-press-on-stadium-exemptions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384858-586dfd06f5a6192ee3e934fc9ee601bb/orig.mp4?Expires=1769869753&Signature=Lca3nAC7HeZA2Gr0Rf3iTD1J7lP4AHehirb~-M9H8LzzXeWFtPfDYmN1jRZAshRDTHvijKIJt4zzaEDLr~8TFoFKGdynKrJGYH51OyfLb0IisYlmWUB1VophHnBG4JljKAQTsTbaaT4GNm4RhfqFqaW-FMM~zNinygNKFd5S3BOVNV9dUeuZ2QW4G~VJK~ChF0oJPUFJWqrq5AeyqFuIoE39Hx0Qxa2dBa4JYlccYLSL6GfU4bVpGXFgZZqyJITa6RwGWfcKRppYBCuY4J5ZXl-hJuLQesxBpUphGpaZMbtgLEXQNxvUghFI0Xl07a-b2cEnT~u9qWZ0cmDKN7zN1g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Michael Sanders, a policy analyst with the Provo City council office, told Neighborhood District 1 on Wednesday that staff are proposing changes to the city’s noise ordinance intended to simplify enforcement and tailor limits to local conditions. \"We tabulated five years of police call data and found out that there were a little under 800 noise complaints a year, or about 64 a month,\" he said, adding that District 5 accounted for 48% of calls and District 1 accounted for about 6% in the citywide tally.

Staff proposed three enforcement-side changes: consolidate multiple noise-determination tables into a shorter set of rules so officers can more quickly assess violations; introduce ambient-noise–based measurements to assess violations relative to local background levels; and remove a detailed, procedural enforcement section from the code to give police more flexibility in how they measure noise for prosecution. Sanders said the existing exemptions would be maintained for emergency vehicles, certain temporary events and fireworks but that the council had asked staff to draft language exempting athletic competitions at stadiums in some form.

The stadium exemption drew the sharpest reaction from residents. A neighborhood resident said the proposed exemptions are problematic: \"It looks like, well, if it's a multibillion dollar sport athletic corporation like BYU, we'll leave them alone,\" the resident said, adding later, \"It looks like you're in collusion with the source of the noise, excessive noise.\" Sanders responded that the council had discussed the matter at a Dec. 17 work meeting and directed staff to draft language that would exempt athletic competitions regardless of time of day and exempt other non-sport stadium activities only during daytime hours, with non-sport night activities requiring a permit from the mayor's office.

Residents asked follow-up questions about permitting, whether cleanup or setup times would be covered by an exemption, and how ambient baseline noise would be measured. Sanders said the draft language does not currently distinguish cleanup or setup time from event time and encouraged written comments to the council before the ordinance is placed on an agenda. He said staff expect the ordinance to be on the council agenda for a vote on January 28th.

The discussion in District 1 was advisory; Sanders repeatedly invited neighbors to email the council or speak at the council meeting when the item appears on the agenda. No ordinance vote occurred at the neighborhood meeting.","Council staff briefed Neighborhood District 1 on proposed noise code revisions that would simplify enforcement, add ambient-noise-based limits and create exemptions for athletic competitions; residents raised concerns about exempting stadiums such as BYU’s from nighttime limits.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Neighborhood District 1 elects new chair, vice chairs and secretary at quarterly meeting

Provo neighborhood traffic studies prompt speed-feedback sign proposals and matching-grant plans

Provo planners outline ADU rules, change paths to approval; Pleasant View remains only area in District 1 where ADUs are allowed by right

Provo council office outlines draft noise ordinance changes; residents press on stadium exemptions