[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6384840,"mediaKeyId","2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4","parentId",2121109,"title","Mass turnout in Chinatown opposes proposed 211 Alpine adult entertainment use; council to seek closed‑session legal briefing","audioSeconds",3253,"startMs",2774525,"endMs",6027860,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4&start=2774&end=6027","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4/thumbnail_2774525.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6384840/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Mass-turnout-in-Chinatown-opposes-proposed-211-Alpine-adult-entertainment-use-council-to-seek-closedsession-legal-briefing","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384840-3c377d7547be47259e27f0e8ef10597e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771207557&Signature=GG45JIo-mS0u05nEFuFzFMFxwiPG5Ju-nHJoBcrVTcsTI8C5h6kImyUx4DkNKxIqs8fzFNYWZaJHwaBPe6TvxZlafW-6fbXsXMxQPChCyeTniez1HSZ1grfYRX1-PwsOralgUfL~i~bS7BhgT-EvTwvwt-xoeGOQnlRR7fb3wJqw6Cihf8wSI9AX95G2~u~moFkB-lnrdOh6Br2YNePEVorAmn5vFMixMqplHEK3fr~lX73dRFgWzD78Hw3BUEH0w77KfcXq11zzAs~84Ticr9l437D2Nf4CqDgDlNLsosigKD5i8MAh8mijBJHKjyK5Mc2H9uNCa1KOIlvcpopsRA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-01-16T17:51:41Z","article","Dozens of Chinatown residents, business owners and civic leaders flooded City Hall on March 28 to oppose a proposed adult entertainment use at 211 Alpine Street, saying the venue would harm families, schools and cultural institutions in the neighborhood.

The concern culminated in an extended public hearing on the matter (item 62a) during which speakers described Chinatown as a living community of churches, schools, family associations and small businesses that should not host an adult entertainment venue. Don Morey, speaking for Chinatown business and residents, said the proposal \"galvanized the community like no other issue in the past 25 years.\" Several speakers said the proposed site sits within walking distance of Castelar Elementary and a community English academy.

The hearing drew attorneys and constitutional experts as well as members of neighborhood and business associations. Attorney Jeffrey Goldfarb, who has defended cities in adult‑business litigation, told the council the city's record and legal arguments make this \"in fact a winnable case,\" arguing that Los Angeles' zoning and permitting system differs from the Simi Valley decision at issue. Another attorney, Ozell (Zell) Branson, said factual claims that the school nearby was not operating were incorrect and that the English‑as‑a‑second‑language program next door had an established curriculum and waiting list.

Councilman Mike Hernandez, whose district includes Chinatown, thanked residents for turning out and said he expected to hear legal advice in closed session to protect the council's position. \"Never have I seen ... a united voice the way you've seen today,\" Hernandez said, urging the council to consider the city attorney's recommendation.

Several councilmembers echoed calls to defend the city code and argued the Simi Valley precedent should not automatically control Los Angeles law. Councilman Burnson, who helped craft the city's 500‑foot buffer rule in earlier years, urged the council to be prepared to \"uphold our city ordinances.\" Councilman Pacheco joined those urging a robust legal defense.

Action and next steps: the council did not take a public vote on the underlying permit at the March 28 hearing. Instead the council held the matter \"on the desk\" to return to it later in the meeting and then directed staff to hold a closed‑session briefing with the city attorney to discuss litigation strategy and qualified immunity concerns. Members instructed that the public comment record remain part of the file and that the council would reconvene consideration after the closed‑session legal briefing.

Why it matters: Chinatown's speakers stressed that the site's proximity to schools, temples and family associations gives the issue outsized community impact. Opponents said an adult venue would damage a multi‑decade economic revival led by small businesses and a newly formed Business Improvement District. Proponents of legal defense argued that Los Angeles' zoning and permitting framework differs from the federal court opinion critics cite and that the city has factual and legal grounds to defend its decisions.

The council indicated it will reconvene and continue the item at a later meeting after the closed‑session briefing from the city attorney; no final public action was taken March 28.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Regular City Council - 03/28/01","oneSentenceSummary","Dozens of Chinatown residents, business owners and civic leaders flooded City Hall on March 28 to oppose a proposed adult entertainment use at 211 Alpine Street, saying the venue would harm families, schools and cultural institutions in the neighborhood.","taxTitle","Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California","taxId",4025,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6384830,"Council approves playground amendment at Wilshire Boulevard Temple school with new conditions and three‑year traffic review",667,9196596,9864460,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4&start=9196&end=9864","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4/thumbnail_9196596.jpg","/articles/6384830/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-playground-amendment-at-Wilshire-Boulevard-Temple-school-with-new-conditions-and-threeyear-traffic-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384830-e446df645926f96abe3ce5133ff33eb7/orig.mp4?Expires=1771207557&Signature=XyUP1DDqccvKjUl1EsONHDVNsiH5MRhiR7t70edJd1Qyrn3Q44PG1FvPzpyq6THDiRTtK5SWI6OZB8L9AfpQenz0q~-ohd--0PKQR9XZewY9bjnOcMl5OK8eJjTZzZBG2KdYjKF4jGe22ICXJAG69CZhGYB7ZW1SZSwfvETxmb2LzRQuFcmFSP40cLCW4A~locGSEEytIs3xvP-z8RnYfYhkhLpPGjSBDWUV2IGcaUOdIv1VpQEcvTOAzXi44aCB0lpQQ6dAx30aowtadn9zhe4trgem7T99hcgujEn7eRiHL8wWi1jMEOU4IGuhuMciuDX0S6~57v6VPGTgrfjh4w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Los Angeles City Council members on March 28 approved an amendment allowing playground equipment at the Wilshire Boulevard Temple school site after extensive public comment and additional conditions from the council and planning committee.

Neighbors told the council they had negotiated with the school during earlier approvals to avoid playground equipment on the site's residential edge. Speakers said the temple's later change to place play equipment on the perimeter breached prior understandings and would increase noise, traffic and intrusion on a quiet residential block.

Rabbi Harvey Fields, speaking for Wilshire Boulevard Temple, said the school had tried to be sensitive to neighbors and that the proposed equipment would serve kindergarten through second‑grade children. The temple also said the school would comply with committee conditions.

Councilwoman Mysikowski and other council members said the zoning administrator had approved modifications and that additional conditions would be added to address noise, hours, the number and ages of children permitted on the perimeter at any time, and continued neighborhood traffic management. Councilwoman Walters said she supported the decision and emphasized that the children's needs must be balanced with neighborhood impacts.

Action and vote: The council voted to approve the planning committee report as amended (item 10). The roll call was recorded as \"10 ayes.\" The approval includes tightened conditions limiting play equipment use to the stated ages and numbers, limits on hours, and continuation of neighborhood traffic management oversight for an additional three years.

Why it matters: The decision balances the school's space and program needs for young children with neighbors' longstanding concerns about noise, parking and perimeter playground placement. The council attached detailed conditions and extended traffic management provisions to try to prevent future conflicts.

Implementation notes: The temple agreed to comply with the conditions; the council placed stronger limits on over‑the‑counter plan amendments so future changes must return to the community and public hearings.","The council approved a request to install playground equipment near the Wilshire Boulevard Temple school (item 10) after public comment from neighbors who opposed perimeter playground placement. Council added conditions on hours, numbers and a three‑year traffic/management review.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6384833,"Council approves amended Porter Ranch community plan and development agreement after public comment",596,6062530,6658945,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4&start=6062&end=6658","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4/thumbnail_6062530.jpg","/articles/6384833/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-amended-Porter-Ranch-community-plan-and-development-agreement-after-public-comment","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384833-f4c1a06b80b4a956c83c98490e2a96a5/orig.mp4?Expires=1771207557&Signature=AgY7TmugNN1Mhi4aJa-D4s7zDITts6RbHMkj5eaAAZjEXXlmG0OeO11lz1rQBgSOUvPrU6gwXgdgqr9QMqazoKczmN9v0SHa3nWi~iNChrWikJQ0U4uM6ueUmRXgqE0fehIZ-63hpFVSllOv5lzFAHQibNBakyFLiHe2FRU4C4dHLoQ4FOqt5FUZqffunYNcOQlTqO4R6Xoj0OJfwhcMZ-e65FKWDIQF0fuSUyADONbElG7MaOZ8zUyQv1rY19XZTQewk~W094Dh9ECsGSvsjw-nwaCR2kLNl4FTAZjgyFYqXx6vAUcaVTzJjYrsSRtnI3dYkRdb6KHk~trFhhBf2g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City Council on March 28 approved an amended Porter Ranch community plan and the associated development agreement following public comment about development density, infrastructure costs and water availability.

Marilyn K. Stout spoke in opposition, delivering a resolution from the County Democratic Party and arguing the project would accelerate sprawl and place fiscal burdens on taxpayers for water, sewers and schools. Stout and others pressed the council to scrutinize maps and lot sizes and to demand stronger cost‑benefit analysis.

Councilman Burnson, representing the area, described the pending action as a reduction of roughly 50% of previously planned commercial space and defended the plan as the product of years of work with the Citizens Advisory Committee and planning staff. He said the plan includes three school sites and a reduction in commercial square footage, and urged a yes vote.

Action and votes: Under city attorney direction the council took two required votes: first on the zone change and specific plan, and then on the development agreement. The clerk recorded unanimous support on each roll call: the transcript records the votes as \"11 ayes\" for both parts. Both items were approved forthwith.

Why it matters: Porter Ranch is a large community‑scale proposal in the city's planning area. Residents and critics argued for stricter controls and more disclosure on infrastructure and water impacts; supporters said the revisions reduce commercial intensity and include mitigation measures.

Implementation notes: The planning and city departments will proceed under the approved amendment and development agreement; design review details and the makeup of future design review boards will be addressed under separate city charter actions and implementation steps.","After public comment raising concerns about growth, water and infrastructure, the council approved amendments to the Porter Ranch community plan and the associated development agreement (item 19). Council votes carried for both the zone/specific plan and the development agreement.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6384836,"Council approves Manchester Square property acquisitions for airport mitigation, asks for open‑space zoning review",1678,6828685,8507190,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4&start=6828&end=8507","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4/thumbnail_6828685.jpg","/articles/6384836/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-Manchester-Square-property-acquisitions-for-airport-mitigation-asks-for-openspace-zoning-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384836-bb87df8d4416706f7b92283660ee2cf2/orig.mp4?Expires=1771207557&Signature=HPKgQqc4NgM4vrgLoKabtkb1N~Sxi0U2PoOFxlCRVgEhjfzY95ocZPKCPP0wJILP9JQNNMrrhvIIspASy~N4ajNfbTl8ZU~GGtOVq1tZOD-QtJtwZt0AI8snOpOVZGd73nG6khuEjei16CDGiUwwknyw-F2F3gh0hZEu2ld7VxwTsGfkoFmdA7x2ZEXdKBD~1b6CmXTzINn3y~pbEBw8X1BjqhPIM8CkvLzYTB-JOAKBQj0NLMbz1LMB~noKeslt5K-sOKX0wYvQkIlLOskF7OR-ScGqq8RSyaiEca0gjHA~ctIafMddj6r0E0yilAI-MjKc3RAMLRh4byX0VVUdPA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council on March 28 approved a motion advancing voluntary property acquisitions in Manchester Square associated with Los Angeles World Airports' (LAWA) mitigation and soundproofing program. The item generated opposing views in the meeting: some residents and community groups urged the council to proceed with acquisitions now to allow property owners in escrow to complete sales and avoid leaving a partly demolished neighborhood; others worried that land purchases and concurrent zoning changes could accelerate airport expansion and asked the council to initiate an open‑space designation for the area.

Speakers from Manchester Square described homes already purchased and partially demolished by LAWA and warned that halting acquisitions would leave remaining property owners unable to sell at fair market prices. David Brown and other residents said the voluntary program resulted from the soundproofing/mitigation process and that LAWA already owned about half the single‑family homes in the neighborhood. Brown asked the council to \"continue the acquisition program now because people lives and livelihoods are at stake.\" Several residents said removing the remaining houses without a settled plan would invite blight and crime.

Opponents, including community groups concerned about airport expansion, worried that rezoning the parcels from residential to public facilities could make future conversion to airport or cargo uses easier. They urged the council instead to initiate a zone change to OS (open space/parkland) so that acquired properties would become a buffer and not part of future airport development.

Councilwoman Mysikowski moved approval of the item and also sought action to initiate a plan amendment and zone change to open space; she noted the airport had already committed properties to the program and that hundreds of homeowners had advanced acquisition applications. The council recorded 10 ayes on the motion and approved the item forthwith. Members said they would move separately and quickly to start the process of considering open‑space designation so that acquisitions would not be used for airport expansion.

Why it matters: Manchester Square sits adjacent to LAX noise contours and is part of the airport's mitigation conversation. Residents and homeowners argued that the voluntary acquisitions are compensation for airport impacts tied to previous expansions and that stopping the program midstream would harm homeowners in escrow. Opponents warned that rezoning could remove future land‑use protections unless the council moved proactively to designate the land open space.

Implementation notes: Council instructed staff to proceed with the acquisition batches as approved and to initiate a plan and zone review for open‑space designation (OS) to be considered at a subsequent meeting, with a follow‑up public process.","The council approved batch purchases tied to LAX mitigation and urged a follow‑up zoning/plan study to designate Manchester Square open space or parkland. Residents who supported the voluntary acquisition program urged the council to proceed so homeowners already in escrow would not be stranded.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6384839,"Council approves ITA pilot form to let city workers route quality‑of‑life reports between departments",728,1716715,2445200,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4&start=1716&end=2445","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2121109-91515744bdd8abed359251fe32ad81d4/thumbnail_1716715.jpg","/articles/6384839/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-ITA-pilot-form-to-let-city-workers-route-qualityoflife-reports-between-departments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384839-2896a8e362c242d68690c0fb8a037f68/orig.mp4?Expires=1771207557&Signature=IRI8tNC1cQ2ItJx9PSFW6XBDIJc2LCcST6tq4jQvOTmFID9FniV~TLslgwMa8LOJCDOkh5ndzS~dYaz9A3-6VgkpWlRzw1jzgPwm0LsjHk6MKlWHsqQh15K8Sse8dk-QrIXAe2ChJdwe5U7UIvFn5eJND-XlubiDCQZj0Bx-0kle3oPpl9TJpMCI1wMrRaUhn1pn~939~7p4HR13xGVnGJ0oMn0j20YU8UCmyr~S9i4NHAcvrMwjBVfNkm-ew3mpHadV0WW2RMulZiLAnE7ctBNrb7rRzOWUpBCa5UEiBnwTyzDg7hGSsswH7yvNEEylxCmfyeJvEXjmSKIBlG~JzA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council on March 28 approved a one‑page intranet \"community enhancement\" request form developed by the Information Technology Agency (ITA), the Chief Legislative Analyst's office and Council District 3. The form will let city employees file a short electronic report when they observe a public problem — potholes, graffiti, broken streetlights — and automatically route the report to the appropriate department.

Councilwoman Chick introduced the presentation and praised the pilot as a way to give the city \"extra pairs of eyes and ears\" in neighborhoods. Richard Tom of the ITA and Bill Kreitz (report author) demonstrated the form, describing drop‑down menus for problem type, an address field that accepts an approximate location and a free‑text comment box. The form is designed for fast completion — benchmark testing showed it takes \"somewhere in the neighborhood of a minute to a minute and a half\" to fill out, officials said.

Mark Wolf of ITA told the council the form is an \"interim solution, leveraging existing citywide forms technology\" that can be migrated into the future citywide service‑request system (the 3‑1‑1/e‑government platform). \"This will be able to, over time, be built into the citywide service request system when that is developed,\" Wolf said. ITA staff said there is no additional cost to departments to use the form and that implementation would occur within 30 to 60 days if the council approved it.

Action and vote: The council opened the roll on the item and recorded \"10 ayes.\" The form was approved \"forthwith.\" The ITA indicated the form will initially be available on the city intranet for city employees and later expanded for public access as part of a broader e‑government rollout.

Why it matters: The form is intended to reduce friction when city employees encounter issues outside their own departments and to speed interdepartmental routing of service requests. Officials framed the project as low‑cost, fast to implement and a building block for the larger 3‑1‑1/e‑government service initiative.

Implementation notes: ITA and CLA staff said they will implement the pilot and monitor usage. Councilman Padilla asked for a follow‑up report to the ITGS (Information Technology and General Services) committee showing how the form will integrate with the longer‑term 3‑1‑1 platform and the city's new public website.","Los Angeles' Information Technology Agency unveiled a one‑page intranet form to let city employees report potholes, graffiti and other quality‑of‑life issues directly to the department responsible. Council approved the pilot (item 9) by a 10‑aye vote and directed implementation within 30–60 days.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Mass turnout in Chinatown opposes proposed 211 Alpine adult entertainment use; council to seek closed‑session legal briefing

Council approves playground amendment at Wilshire Boulevard Temple school with new conditions and three‑year traffic review

Council approves amended Porter Ranch community plan and development agreement after public comment

Council approves Manchester Square property acquisitions for airport mitigation, asks for open‑space zoning review

Council approves ITA pilot form to let city workers route quality‑of‑life reports between departments