[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6672727,"mediaKeyId","2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493","parentId",2117173,"title","Council reviews Mitigation Fee Act annual report for fiscal 2023–24; staff to return with updated fee study","audioSeconds",201,"startMs",11042000,"endMs",11243000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493&start=11042&end=11243","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493/thumbnail_11042000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6672727/Encinitas/San-Diego-County/California/Council-reviews-Mitigation-Fee-Act-annual-report-for-fiscal-202324-staff-to-return-with-updated-fee-study","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6672727-a9756a78f1d535be520e67411652eb9b/orig.mp4?Expires=1773201971&Signature=IkuYjqdDf9YqZ9~MZQWmWFjuwKTPMu7huJdZSayItDm6~f8bGQ6URUXzxOUoRLopnyxrAqwSXTtwVnyuqp3lwVKTFMNffBXxOGNrW8lKXzXewLwDxZKvLr~IiYb~UWP-saN7tBajVArhrnxXj~SnrI8EXfZEHCCYjpA3AWiZRXRGhAeNvamvIIOIsq3C5-65bVzluzA6M2TcnBX-JQdm4J7wc55L2TP3~0gFXJMIiNMpPG3KTZgcEPjKcmjggrJoMR5cZAQ~stvNdVgb1r1S3n5saPNMntKoQklzCkWxsi64eaRf4IXofTbcNmtSxha-nlwxsaHN-OgXlPb4TWGwJQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Encinitas, CA","date","2025-01-16T05:13:30.34Z","article","City staff presented the Mitigation Fee Act annual report for fiscal year 2023–24 during the Jan. 15 meeting and summarized the required disclosures on separate impact‑fee funds, fund balances and intended uses.

Staff reminded the council that state law requires separate funds for each development‑impact fee, an annual public report and five‑year findings when unexpended balances exist. The city currently collects nine fees covering parks, traffic, open space and trails, library/community facilities, fire protection and flood control. The report complied with those requirements and was made available to the public.

Council members asked staff about recent trends. One council member noted an unusually large one‑year spike in traffic mitigation fees in 2020 and higher receipts for park development and parkland acquisition fees in FY2023–24; staff said they are working with a consultant on an updated impact‑fee study that will be presented to council in spring. The consultant’s update will include recommended fee adjustments to reflect current demand and costs.

No formal vote was required to receive the annual report; staff said the report is provided to the council to meet state statutory requirements and that the report will be posted publicly. Council members expressed interest in revisiting fee levels and pledged to examine adjustments when staff returns with the consultant’s updated impact‑fee study.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Encinitas Regular City Council Meeting Live Stream 01/15/2025","oneSentenceSummary","City staff presented the Mitigation Fee Act annual report for fiscal year 2023–24 showing fees collected for parks, traffic and other impact funds; council discussed recent increases in several categories and staff said an updated fee study will return in spring.","taxTitle","Encinitas, San Diego County, California","taxId",3828,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6672732,"Residents warn council the Santa Fe Drive streetscape and regional wildfire risk threaten safety",528,1942000,2470000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493&start=1942&end=2470","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493/thumbnail_1942000.jpg","/articles/6672732/Encinitas/San-Diego-County/California/Residents-warn-council-the-Santa-Fe-Drive-streetscape-and-regional-wildfire-risk-threaten-safety","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6672732-f11aae4416a9c1aa7d6a10a5e2f49cb5/orig.mp4?Expires=1773201971&Signature=B-Lg0AONeGgxOdEk2WWAZnlGvR2Pu3-mtonVazJSOH0qW-hUiK8ATuxRkf-cL5PWdQQ~Nlmk-vbaw2JHY3hiuH9vcdTEwkqkJP3qOyWLI1qBUQXCcPo1d5QYKNgzEy6gGxQCEXlaPMATVLycwfPxH2dVo2DKKazv3YYF9Yk7fRfRWTeeKQqrk0FfizkJ7LW07JRIzAuiIfNBFmxBgKWadlkVAZHmfEIiaeJjGGPziIoHDpgDZnoy1YvJmzZrMqCQ7DhK394JAaCw-1iWQF6G3-Nbj9hWeuA8ffCHHMcibx6tv0qPhxR3MKtz63jQ4I92M3Zu8t8RAsH6F1yBYg9kzQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Dozens of residents during the Jan. 15 public-comment period pressed the Encinitas City Council on public‑safety concerns tied to the recently reconfigured Santa Fe Drive corridor and broader wildfire and drought risks across the city.

Residents described lane widths they measured as below the required 10 feet in multiple locations and said new striping and deep planter boxes leave drivers with little margin for error. “Some [lanes are] as much as a foot less than the required 10 feet,” said Natalie Satoun Cardiff, who said she and city staff measured more than a dozen locations and found only one compliant reading. Scott Campbell told the council that narrow lanes forced cars into gutters and “this is not lane diet, this is anorexic lanes.”

Several speakers said the new design impedes emergency access to the hospital and increases vehicle conflict and near‑miss incidents. “There’s no room for emergency vehicle egress when all three are in use,” Satoun said, citing multiple DUI collisions that were logged for the corridor in 2024. Longtime residents and drivers told council they watched delivery and transit vehicles detour through neighborhood streets because they could not make turns onto or from Santa Fe.

Multiple speakers asked the council to halt landscaping and re‑striping work until a fuller safety review is completed; others urged immediate remedial action such as grinding out striping in noncompliant areas and removing oversized planters. “If you don’t stop this now, and that includes landscaping, it’s not just the lights… stop the landscaping,” said Donna Westbrook.

Separately, public commenters also pressed the council over wildfire risk and illegal fireworks, with Bernadette Dillon and others urging stepped‑up enforcement and use of tools such as drones to curb illegal fireworks that residents say could ignite drought‑affected canyons. “We are a fire from Cardiff to La Jolla… it’s going to take one firework,” Dillon said, asking the city to increase penalties for illegal fireworks. Sheila Cameron and other residents urged the council to produce or publicize an evacuation plan and to coordinate with regional transit and the Red Cross for mass‑evacuation readiness.

Council members did not take immediate action during oral communications but acknowledged the concerns and discussed follow‑up steps later in the meeting. Several council members said staff were already reviewing safety complaints and that specific street‑design and public‑safety reviews would be considered within staff work programs. The city manager’s office later circulated a reminder about emergency‑preparedness resources on the city website and said city fire personnel were assisting mutual‑aid operations outside the region.","Multiple residents urged the Encinitas City Council to reconsider Santa Fe Drive streetscape elements, striping and planters that they say narrow travel lanes, impede emergency access and increase crash risk; several speakers also urged stronger action on wildfire preparedness and illegal fireworks enforcement.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6672736,"Council upholds Planning Commission approval for Camino Apartments; adds nesting-bird condition",4069,4863000,8932000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493&start=4863&end=8932","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493/thumbnail_4863000.jpg","/articles/6672736/Encinitas/San-Diego-County/California/Council-upholds-Planning-Commission-approval-for-Camino-Apartments-adds-nesting-bird-condition","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6672736-6286641b93eb59a47381ea1253caf4a6/orig.mp4?Expires=1773201971&Signature=Ysw~LYIApm~uGrHbb3WdTBi5tEGaopwcnqc5HUiJRaxuBY~P-3UoLCe4e5MOwk0m8Jjh-gKreJp8b-~8ra2wVYynLXYzdcB9ukCXCGmhCCTmxs7OEHzIgBq-ymYlT2JEHlkk3gA5yanUxWZzqNyh0FWpnzfcX0OhHaB7xQ4xyg8Ji2scOqN5TjFTuEPe~9NeDz0VNv3XfFQz63EGD0NWhezi9eKkOwAAE8r37yQSeClRaoGs0Cp~PThPUQ2RJAgIDbAbSQuai4zPuhYm8mCRPV8GHQOIrg1w6E4NGUN2DGa2JS2wW7IWhFBMB3KoFeY-zWQ5875AeSer8C8xP7MVkg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Encinitas City Council on Jan. 15 declined an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Camino Apartments — a proposed four‑story, 87‑unit development on El Camino Real — allowing the Planning Commission decision to stand.

Senior Planner Esteban Dana summarized staff findings, including a biological technical report by Helix Environmental Planning that concluded the site is “nearly surrounded by existing development” and not part of a regional wildlife corridor. The report said the site may host common nesting birds and recommended pre‑construction surveys during the nesting season (Jan. 15–Sept. 15) to comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code. Dana said staff added a condition of approval to memorialize those legal obligations.

The appellant, identified in the record as Ruben Flores, submitted a prerecorded presentation to council saying he learned of the project only shortly before the Planning Commission hearing and raising two appeal points: the need for a mitigation plan for migratory birds and a claim that two Torrey pine trees on the site were naturally occurring and should be retained. Flores said he met the applicant but had limited time to prepare materials for the Planning Commission hearing. “I only learned about the development the day before it was coming to the planning commission,” Flores said in the recording.

Applicant representative Brian Grover said the developer and staff had prepared a biological technical report and that pre‑construction nesting‑bird surveys are already standard practice. “A nesting bird survey is a very typical preconstruction requirement,” Grover told the council, and he said the applicant will comply. Grover also said the two Torrey pines were planted as part of past grading and landscaping; staff produced 1987 grading and landscape plans that show Torrey pines were put on the manufactured slope. Council members reviewed those plans during the hearing.

Council member Schafer cited the landscaping records and said the evidence indicates the Torrey pines were artificially planted after the grading work in the late 1980s; Schafer moved to deny the appeal and add a condition of approval memorializing compliance with federal and state laws protecting nesting birds. The motion was seconded.

After public comment — several residents spoke both for and against the project on aesthetics, parking and environmental issues — the council concluded the appeal did not present legal grounds to overturn the Planning Commission’s findings. City staff and the applicant confirmed the project will replace the two Torrey pines with five new Torrey pines as part of the approved landscaping plan. The council recorded that the Planning Commission approval stands; staff said the added condition will require pre‑construction nesting surveys to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code.

The record shows the council’s action leaves the Planning Commission approval in place. The city attorney said staff will confirm the council’s required vote threshold for the supplemental condition and report back.

The council did not specify a numeric roll-call tally for the final determination in the transcript; the clerk recorded the Planning Commission decision as standing at the end of the hearing.","The City Council declined the appeal of a 87‑unit El Camino Real apartment project, allowing the Planning Commission approval to stand; council added a condition to memorialize federal and state protections for migratory birds and heard evidence that two Torrey pines on the site were planted, not naturally occurring.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6672741,"Encinitas council accepts Beacons Beach parking-lot project, files notice of completion",608,4153000,4761000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493&start=4153&end=4761","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2117173-2a428a6180c574482314b6b413ff0493/thumbnail_4153000.jpg","/articles/6672741/Encinitas/San-Diego-County/California/Encinitas-council-accepts-Beacons-Beach-parking-lot-project-files-notice-of-completion","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6672741-005c0a822bd576f20c4925b67ac73423/orig.mp4?Expires=1773201971&Signature=g~VbMEhceRaj-15OM7P1v51sksFraZudYZkAVM5K68IV3a9CWegWtP5~Wnoz5CV~EK9Z8PqqtdAKJdGxs8kUpnDinnL~qUl4G9NsIdnJTazBPS1LfeCcZTSnPaQQHCEu8kGgnTFf-bINUDdGzO5XnkiAw1VpIHlq4Odsqz14BKoxA3kFvhsOcUWPpnJ9Zmfx1qZFpHZ78TeZn6DSzEH0ExzvbWd19TRBuOkuoglkOvbcSxLqT2AY8nvhkQT~xOMjNhK4kz5D6scr84aRYqmZicSo1Qb2z3GDTjpt1Jml8PC2KptjamIjOlVDAGfyNAMEQbnlZjr1ETyHjCI1wpFuEA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Encinitas City Council on Jan. 15 accepted the completed reconstruction of the Beacons Beach parking lot and authorized the filing of a Notice of Completion, starting the statutory closeout and warranty process for the public improvements.

Senior Engineer Ben Stryker told the council the parking lot work is finished “to the satisfaction of the city engineer per the approved plans,” noting that sidewalks, benches, fencing and new asphalt are open for public use. He said outstanding contractor invoices and final certified payroll documentation remain but staff anticipates the project will come in under the appropriated budget. “At this time, we are under budget,” Stryker said.

The action authorizes release of the contractor’s payment bond after recording the notice and begins a one-year warranty period required by the California Public Contract Code, during which the city will inspect workmanship and materials before releasing the performance bond. Jim Knowlton, the city’s geotechnical consultant, told the council the small bluff sloughing observed in January resulted from king tides and was “in no way related to the work that was performed by the city.” He said the parking-lot reconstruction included no bluff-stabilization work and does not affect a separate stabilization study.

Council members asked about budget, warranty length and whether recent bluff activity would affect future stabilization plans. Stryker confirmed the one-year warranty period is standard under the California Public Contract Code, and said payment and performance bonds remain in place per usual public works practice. Council member Jim O’Hara pressed whether the project required additional funds; Stryker said none are anticipated.

The motion to accept the project and file the Notice of Completion passed unanimously with Deputy Mayor Lyons absent. The city will perform warranty inspections after one year and maintain the newly planted vegetation — including California rose bushes along the site’s northern edge — intended to screen headlights and discourage trespass.

Council discussion also noted the parking lot work was part of the city’s routine capital improvement project cycle and the closeout process will include release of bonds per the Public Contract Code.

The council moved on to other agenda items after recording the vote; staff said they will follow standard post-construction closeout procedures and return to council if any additional budgetary or contract issues arise.","The City Council accepted the reconstructed Beacons Beach parking lot, authorized filing of a Notice of Completion and began the one-year warranty period; staff said the project is expected to come in under budget and does not affect planned bluff-stabilization work.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council reviews Mitigation Fee Act annual report for fiscal 2023–24; staff to return with updated fee study

Residents warn council the Santa Fe Drive streetscape and regional wildfire risk threaten safety

Council upholds Planning Commission approval for Camino Apartments; adds nesting-bird condition

Encinitas council accepts Beacons Beach parking-lot project, files notice of completion