During the Turlock City Council's regular meeting on January 14, 2025, significant discussions centered around the allocation of funds from the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program, aimed at addressing the city's affordable housing needs. The council reviewed a proposed five-year plan amendment that would adjust budget appropriations for the PLHA program, which was established under California's Building Homes and Jobs Act in 2017.
The PLHA program is designed to provide ongoing funding to local jurisdictions for affordable housing initiatives, with a mandate that 40% of the funds be directed towards owner-occupied workforce housing. The council's proposal included allocating funds for first-time homebuyer assistance and the rehabilitation of city-owned properties to meet housing quality standards.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free A key point of contention arose when the council voted on a motion related to the funding allocation, which ultimately did not pass, with Vice Mayor Moniz and Council Members Phillips and Bujak voting against it. This decision sparked public outcry, particularly from community members concerned about the growing homeless population and the perceived inadequacy of the council's response to housing challenges.
City staff outlined plans to rehabilitate three city-owned homes and proposed two options for their future: selling them to first-time homebuyers or transferring them to a nonprofit for affordable rental housing. The estimated cost for rehabilitating these properties was approximately $193,000, which represents a significant portion of the available funding.
Public comments highlighted frustrations regarding the council's handling of housing issues, with some residents expressing disappointment over the council's failure to pass measures that could have provided immediate relief to those in need. Questions were raised about the long-term sustainability of affordable housing initiatives and whether nonprofits would be adequately equipped to maintain properties over the required 55-year period.
In conclusion, the meeting underscored the ongoing challenges Turlock faces in addressing affordable housing and homelessness. As the council navigates funding allocations and community needs, the implications of their decisions will be closely watched by residents advocating for more robust solutions to the housing crisis. The council is expected to revisit the PLHA funding plan in future meetings, aiming to align their strategies with the pressing demands of the community.