[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6384618,"mediaKeyId","2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511","parentId",2122463,"title","HUD committee backs WashU plan to add 1.13-acre parcel to Danforth Campus CUP","audioSeconds",924,"startMs",143000,"endMs",1067000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511&start=143&end=1067","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511/thumbnail_143000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6384618/St-Louis-City/St-Louis-County/Missouri/HUD-committee-backs-WashU-plan-to-add-113-acre-parcel-to-Danforth-Campus-CUP","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384618-f4e9272fb226c1ec4cd9652ad00224ec/orig.mp4?Expires=1773544156&Signature=L9vSOB94f~RvNVfdf-MAC0lRqbBw3orYzVA80uPZ7~CLpiqVU8eU2oOgZiUr8mQ35LOxjBfg8ohW4B8gxjmaeMKTQxdEPX9wspD6wh7YpKFyaAKlEoJ2Sm9mRwZiCb8MBuP2hn2ynrKSyGnZvdvuXr7iKo77J8XSGzuOLUfiLSANr0Ayv5jxiHHtsu4D9MopiupL~eC4RW7zAE9sYnAHjMTvFVNIrpGW8UrEbZECOxrtS8SYjVbLjsC81zTWaNa0qsv8tFwhoCQq9AHhsVinmeaKSmr5Hhq2qrdXdcltQ0AVJ5XquhlHAlWPSXJLJQNHJ92Y2iveFYySXofsnUKXNg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of St. Louis, MO","date","2025-01-16T23:48:37.053Z","article","The Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee voted to forward Board Bill 157 with a due-pass recommendation after hearing staff and university presentations on a Washington University Community Unit Plan amendment that would add one parcel just south of the Danforth Campus at Forsyth and Skinker.

The CUP amendment, introduced by Alderwoman Charmaine Clark Hubbard, would expand the existing Danforth Campus CUP to include a consolidated 1.13-acre parcel that WashU bought by combining two earlier lots (6214 and 6200 Forsyth). Planning Department staff described the change as a targeted overlay that adds specific development standards — permitted university office and student service uses, defined vehicle and pedestrian access points, a minimum of eight on-site parking spaces with ADA-compliant and electric-vehicle-ready stalls, height, lot-coverage, landscaping, screening and signage rules — intended to guide a proposed university office and student services building and to limit future noninstitutional uses on the parcel.

\"The goal of the CUP amendment is to facilitate redevelopment of the parcel and add specific area standards for the new parcel,\" James Pfister of the Planning and Urban Design Agency told the committee. Pfister said the parcel is within an area designated in the Strategic Land Use Plan as an \"Institutional Preservation and Development Area,\" and that the overlay provides more precise standards than the underlying A (single-family dwelling) zoning district.

Joanna Schooler, assistant vice chancellor for local government and community relations at Washington University, told the panel the university plans to retain the adjacent single-family house used for university purposes, demolish the former church acquired in 2022 and build a new 25,000-square-foot facility for administrative offices and student services. She said on-site parking would be limited and additional parking would be provided in existing campus parking structures nearby.

One member of the public praised WashU's campus presence but asked the university to do more on sustainability and climate goals in some past projects; WashU representatives said the Tech Den house would be retained and the proposed building would include accessibility improvements.

Committee members had few substantive questions. After public comment the committee voted to move Board Bill 157 from committee with a due-pass recommendation; the clerk called the roll and recorded affirmative votes during the committee meeting. The bill will go to the full Board of Aldermen for further consideration.

Why it matters: The CUP process creates an overlay of rules tailor-made to large institutional campuses. For neighborhoods adjacent to major institutions, CUPs are the primary tool to set allowable uses, access points, building envelope and parking expectations. The CUP expansion codifies WashU’s intended campus use of the parcel and creates enforceable site standards for future development on that property.

What’s next: Board Bill 157 now advances with the committee’s due-pass recommendation. Any changes the full Board adopts could alter the area standards; if approved by the Board the ordinance would govern future design review and building permits for the parcel.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Housing, Urban Development and Zoning - January 14, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee voted to send Board Bill 157 — a Washington University amendment to the Danforth Campus Community Unit Plan (CUP) — forward with a due-pass recommendation, clearing the way for a CUP overlay to cover a consolidated 1.13-acre parcel at Forsyth and Skinker.","taxTitle","St. Louis City, St. Louis County, Missouri","taxId",2587,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6384615,"Committee advances package to rebate earnings tax on new Anders employees to keep accounting firm downtown",709,1463000,2172000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511&start=1463&end=2172","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511/thumbnail_1463000.jpg","/articles/6384615/St-Louis-City/St-Louis-County/Missouri/Committee-advances-package-to-rebate-earnings-tax-on-new-Anders-employees-to-keep-accounting-firm-downtown","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384615-590e82b1dfb127879ca08e07ec456a3d/orig.mp4?Expires=1773544156&Signature=GCwLIk0z838yLejOTyyulcWTJIqU9UXJZePoFmoqwg~qzfAgXl1DcpGal~GsUfvtoLQIaBdO1hpOjHUAJRYYVhpJUPxyUwC5eI8tnPqoDgS0CJTi-wGp-1F7nj97iUXlVg3YFvTuHlXdKifvPBVY3lB9tFDVQpmUkDgPq3ozdliujds3eaDoMEOl-lOnUnXe0J7rTqe947ZgSipnJIuGqZS4PNs8zdhj7ybGvBDHxgsu4Jnc7du2aiuew8Y9D4FiNXsfMNPM8GEewUEzL5HOWm0QZTOy594NnOvFwAYPQBtOTS4uzxD95VH8ZlsL1dM0x34GOD0uW5L9jDF7F-J22A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee moved a proposal, Board Bill 166, from committee with a committee substitute that would rebate up to 85% of the City of St. Louis earnings tax on payroll attributable to new employees added by Anders, a downtown accounting firm seeking to expand.

Sponsor Alderwoman Kara Spencer told the committee Anders has grown from about 200 to roughly 225 employees and plans to add up to roughly 234 new jobs over 10 years while making a planned capital investment of about $2.2 million in its downtown leased space. Greater St. Louis Inc. testified that downtown office vacancy is elevated compared with the broader region and that keeping or growing office employers in the city is a key economic goal; the agency said private investors have pledged matching capital if the city invests in downtown revitalization.

The committee substitute tightens eligibility and reporting rules, limits the rebate to net new employees (excluding growth from mergers or acquisitions), and includes performance thresholds: applicants must reach a minimum number of new, higher‑paid positions before benefits apply, and the rebate operates as a reimbursement rather than an upfront abatement. Anders’ representatives said the firm has repeatedly committed to staying downtown and that at least one building they occupy is in receivership, making the firm’s continued lease a factor in whether the structure’s condition would worsen if the employer left.

Committee members pressed for safeguards: how the city would verify new jobs and wages, how long the program would run (the sponsor said a ten‑year period was contemplated), and how the rebate would avoid subsidizing a firm that simply acquires another company and counts those employees as new. The committee substitute incorporates an explicit exclusion for employees gained through mergers, added after discussions with the sponsor’s office and staff.

Public comment included local business leaders and development advocates who said the incentive could catalyze downtown reinvestment; other members of the public urged caution about forgoing earnings-tax revenue for incentives and said the city should prioritize resident needs including schools and public safety.

The committee recorded support for the committee substitute in a roll call and later voted to forward Board Bill 166 with a due-pass recommendation; the measure will next go to the full Board of Aldermen.

Why it matters: The earnings tax is the city’s significant recurring revenue source. Programs that rebate a portion of new earnings-tax revenue aim to preserve downtown employers and encourage local hiring, but reduce near-term tax receipts and require careful scoring of net new jobs and safeguards against subsidy of mergers.

What’s next: The committee passed the measure to the full Board with a due-pass recommendation. City staff and the sponsor’s office will need to finalize eligibility, monitoring, reporting and clawback provisions for the full Board’s consideration.

","The HUD committee advanced Board Bill 166 in committee with a committee substitute that would create a rebate of earnings tax on net-new employees hired by Anders, a downtown accounting firm that says it will expand in the city if given a payroll-tax incentive.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6384609,"Committee advances committee substitute for Transform St. Louis package after lengthy debate on spending priorities",621,4965000,5586000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511&start=4965&end=5586","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2122463-a24769a562380abefcd3a4608ec75511/thumbnail_4965000.jpg","/articles/6384609/St-Louis-City/St-Louis-County/Missouri/Committee-advances-committee-substitute-for-Transform-St-Louis-package-after-lengthy-debate-on-spending-priorities","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6384609-1b76875a12045332feb71df86ed19674/orig.mp4?Expires=1773544156&Signature=E3MCnC5IgRCoMbNwdqK4MS7xvlvXS1lOMnAvyfFpiMEhwbqbwxZ2kLb7dXFaeLag6tdS2lBO6TwF~bZZ6lexXE4ioFzElo5Fuo9O5jZ47HgvzR-UM~FAZsKYi5V4Oep-pQYHylz8w~VoaILI1QA2YBq06dTt9G0qwU7p3WaWEfHpm~EL6kWoXdL8XhsI1gIbQ7HZmeP1HObrrSMw2EaexuZY7v1RC~M6r8kYPRi0ma6SsGiFTw3DnxpAy5UeYN~RXLc2XGagApxUUCXLcDSzuknB-PDevRpFFgdmN25Kp3HniNJXAdLF-fXqovd1smBOYjIAH9maUX9PgNyedlUyBA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee heard a lengthy public and departmental hearing on a committee substitute that would invest the NFL Rams settlement in a multi‑part city strategy to revive downtown and disinvested neighborhoods.

Sponsor Alderwoman Pam Boyd presented a committee substitute that splits approximately $277 million of the settlement into major categories: roughly $146 million for infrastructure (with a $50 million addition specifically designated for citywide water infrastructure), $81 million for high‑impact catalytic building projects, $35 million for housing initiatives and $15 million for retail revitalization. The substitute defines \"disinvested neighborhoods\" using the City’s economic justice index and assigns set shares of money to North St. Louis, southeast neighborhoods and downtown priorities.

City departments and outside groups detailed what they would do with the funds. The Water Division explained a multi-decade backlog of capital needs, the benefit of leveraging low-interest state and federal loans, and how dedicated settlement money could be used to shore up mains, treatment plant components and other critical assets without an immediate major rate shock for customers. The Community Development Administration (CDA) offered a prospectus for a housing development and neighborhood program that would blend loans, partially forgivable support and predevelopment financing to catalyze rehabilitation, preservation and new units, plus home-repair and homebuyer assistance. Planning, St. Louis economic development groups and nonprofit stakeholders described priorities for targeted investments and urged safeguards and transparency.

Public commenters — more than 40 people spoke in person and online — heavily supported investment in North St. Louis neighborhoods and downtown buildings, asked for clear oversight and auditing and urged the committee to protect community benefits such as local hiring and housing affordability. Several speakers called for prioritizing water and street repairs and asked that city residents receive first priority in housing programs and job training funded by the settlement.

Committee amendments adopted during the meeting: members added prioritization language for disinvested neighborhoods (explicitly listing North St. Louis, downtown and southeast tracts), required that funds targeted to childcare and workforce initially prioritize city workers and clarified that child-care facilities receiving city money must be licensed. The committee substitute also added language to route water infrastructure appropriations through the Board of Public Service and to require Board oversight and reporting to the Board of Aldermen.

Committee members debated the proper balance between downtown investment and neighborhood investment, the role of private matching funds pledged by Greater St. Louis Inc., the timeline for spending (committee language sets an ambitious schedule) and governance (how much of the work should be vested in the Board of Public Service versus CDA, SLDC or other agencies). Several members urged consolidating bills and convening additional hearings before the full Board acts.

The committee adopted the committee substitute on a recorded vote and forwarded the measure with a due-pass recommendation. Sponsors said more hearings and technical work will follow to finalize rules for stewardship, auditing and project selection before implementation begins.

Why it matters: The settlement funds represent a once-in-a-generation infusion of capital. How the city targets that money — water, streets, housing, catalytic buildings, retail — will shape downtown’s recovery, neighborhood stability and the city budget for years. Committee language seeks to balance catalytic downtown investments (intended to generate private matching dollars) with targeted spending in historically disinvested neighborhoods.

What’s next: Committee sponsors and departments will refine implementation rules, audit and oversight processes, and the Board of Aldermen will consider the committee substitute. The committee also scheduled an additional public hearing to receive further testimony and written comments before final Board action.

","HUD committee heard more than three hours of testimony on a committee substitute (variants of Board Bills 131 and 153) proposing to invest Rams settlement funds in three major buckets — infrastructure (including $50 million for water), catalytic building projects, housing and retail revitalization — with added oversight, reporting and prioritiza","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

HUD committee backs WashU plan to add 1.13-acre parcel to Danforth Campus CUP

Committee advances package to rebate earnings tax on new Anders employees to keep accounting firm downtown

Committee advances committee substitute for Transform St. Louis package after lengthy debate on spending priorities