[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6379686,"mediaKeyId","2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245","parentId",2135377,"title","Votes at a glance: Gateway SD board approves consent items, personnel actions and financial reports; multiple items tabled or removed","audioSeconds",744,"startMs",2006000,"endMs",2750000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245&start=2006&end=2750","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245/thumbnail_2006000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6379686/Pennsylvania/Votes-at-a-glance-Gateway-SD-board-approves-consent-items-personnel-actions-and-financial-reports-multiple-items-tabled-or-removed","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6379686-97d93817b9ee6882cd15e4146fe875cf/orig.mp4?Expires=1770641239&Signature=gEbOhx06hHr6DqyMKDRByGydwTnH6WaW8J4ueT732e9QUYHwDu2R2TWS0wW1tBcdFXPiNy0YCzphqm-M2zKwLabco6i5C3SAJ0WMQdb1OxDejGoIF3oAp0v7C1O6EM69qR4TdR3m5DKNmd0xBGgF0~BkBvVJmOQEEF7MAFhDdbvDhaqK-dzKLc78yx49HqEe38Qh6qU6mfDnGD6fU7wTJQ72dX58kVSy9LimivGACuTAFoR~W5emdz-qwIKjiyn1HUETNIzPTS8ZUV4V58c~foqQPKM-Fb-bEDNWMgrVlOXVB9ei3mBl1Lxr~qX2DwUWxO~hDoYEppQN2KuNgfQQxg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-01-20T16:46:42Z","article","The Gateway School District Board of Education on Oct. 28 approved a series of routine consent and administrative items, approved personnel and financial reports and removed two policy-review items from the agenda for future consideration.

Key outcomes

- Minutes: The board approved minutes from the previous meeting. The motion carried on a roll call with members responding \"Aye.\"

- Financials: The board approved the list of bills for October 2024 and the financial statements for September 2024 after motion and second.

- Consent blocks: The board voted to approve agenda items 7.1 through 7.8 inclusive as listed on the agenda (these included personnel postings, supplementals, and other administrative items). Board members asked questions about supplementals and current vacancies before voting.

- Administrative resolutions: The board approved administrative resolutions 8.1 through 8.7 as they appeared on the agenda after removing items 8.21 and 8.22 (the policy 103 and 104 reviews) from consideration tonight.

- Personnel and tenure: The board recognized nine individuals as having earned tenure for the 2023–24 school year in accordance with school code; hiring and vacancy updates were discussed and the administration reported active recruitment for open positions.

- Bonds and reimbursements: The board approved a reimbursement resolution related to prior bond proceeds and transfers from the general fund to the construction fund to cover Gateway Middle School costs; the administration explained the resolution protects the district’s ability to claim state plan-construction reimbursement in the future.

Votes and procedure notes: Several items were handled in blocks to move the meeting along; board members used roll-call votes for many approvals. For items that needed more information or elicited public comment, the board either tabled discussion or removed the item from the agenda (8.21 and 8.22). Where roll calls are recorded in the minutes, individual board members responded \"Aye.\" No roll-call opposition was recorded on the main consent and administrative approvals discussed during the meeting.

Ending: The board closed the meeting after committee reports, administrative updates and a brief series of resident non-agenda comments.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","SBRM 2024-10-28","oneSentenceSummary","At its Oct. 28 meeting the Gateway School District board approved minutes, bills and financial statements, multiple administrative resolutions and personnel items, and removed policy reviews 8.21 and 8.22 from the agenda for further study.","taxTitle","Gateway SD, School Districts, Pennsylvania","taxId",38796,"location","Pennsylvania","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6379691,"Gateway SD will not sponsor international travel program but will acknowledge participation",250,2102000,2352000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245&start=2102&end=2352","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245/thumbnail_2102000.jpg","/articles/6379691/Pennsylvania/Gateway-SD-will-not-sponsor-international-travel-program-but-will-acknowledge-participation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6379691-ba5f148cb642432000abe157d3644b1e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770641239&Signature=hUx6kRxCN7B~7Qk5zbvAU~Jb3Q4TEVItjik9ycazchaGwqvoNfuU5VcGjUrMHSGWp90skXFtPwjxGdgvOoAIhoGluIjhht5o9~khAG~K52zTMgvORJatD-PhgjD1pG9TRKoFZKj3Eb9aDF0wul9NUdWQXs8NumSTl6WD0Z3X3EedV36P72buwJskiEyNDA6PTnZGbgFFmhRJiybucHT-AB-ICB9P2HQJqu0JMz~hIcVj~aPdo8-lixZ1pRNYeYmiuJugvQYyiQwJUoSI0xCHy2drTVRRMysuMvaSN1AlQ4FkUZYydiocsj1WJDr2hbd6gcuyIrHdPDPIJ6LuqZGmbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gateway School District board on Oct. 28 agreed to acknowledge an international travel program without formally sponsoring it, allowing student participation but reserving district non-liability and limiting use of district resources.

Board members discussed whether the district should \"sponsor\" the program, which carries implications for use of school facilities and potential legal responsibility. John (board member) moved to \"untable\" the item so the board could discuss it; the board then debated whether sponsorship would permit program organizers to meet on school property and whether sponsorship could be interpreted as district endorsement.

\"It is not sponsored by Gateway per se,\" said a board member during discussion. Another board member, Mr. Dice, advised caution: \"I don't... think you should get in the business and let it happen for a year or two. See how it goes.\"

The board approved a motion to acknowledge the international travel program and to revisit the topic annually while explicitly not sponsoring it at this time. Board members said an unsponsored group could seek meeting space at public libraries or other community locations if not permitted to meet on school property, and that sponsorship would require waivers and could create legal exposure.

Why it matters: Sponsorship would have allowed organizers use of district facilities and potentially created closer operational ties between the program and the district. By choosing not to sponsor the program, the board limited the district’s formal involvement while preserving students’ ability to participate in the travel opportunity.

The motion’s outcome: The board carried a motion to \"acknowledge\" the program and not sponsor it; members agreed to review the program’s status in future board meetings. The motion was seconded and approved without public roll-call opposition during the discussion.

Ending: Board members asked staff to clarify any waiver language and to provide administrators guidance on what uses of district facilities would be allowed for unsponsored community groups if they seek campus space in the future.","The board agreed to permit an international travel program to operate without district sponsorship, meaning the program may proceed but will not be sponsored by Gateway School District or use district resources as a sponsored activity.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6379697,"Residents urge caution as Gateway SD board pauses review of policies 103 and 104",426,148000,574000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245&start=148&end=574","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2135377-591a057aac762f49e7ca631ef190a245/thumbnail_148000.jpg","/articles/6379697/Pennsylvania/Residents-urge-caution-as-Gateway-SD-board-pauses-review-of-policies-103-and-104","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6379697-9a1d6df3672f175603ba018e4931e41b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770641239&Signature=YeRGO0bJx5QFBiHO~vqnUmaWhiFCzIhPDKhSw42CmGiQ00SBUHtrvrR0O95otSapdZ-J~ZDlJqWM6UbLEswWNAWTbXoBYOucBlxgY5n-ZvR8mNFoDq8hY1AK5b9niCB32-70Dl9pFpI2gYLdcA3V5TFMlTjSPDCGpiBAU7K8jeXxUJOYpnvFFaJhPA7HANBrZinTUujpmy6ufhObVEHP-8Xvqckr2NcaZwBFuGRpL69AaNkUdytnKCOyooIR9Ni-1e9agtCcsEsd0SoMY6dZyAtz88ph~tTm7EjRO0D5QRMBUi2Irt6gUtZB2VZcppTWUHhpZBxIvvOfhNrFE21itg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gateway School District Board of Education on Oct. 28 removed review of policies 103 and 104 from the board agenda after several residents urged the board to reconsider language in policy 103 that commenters said could affect how the district treats sex-separated activities and facilities.

Public commenters told the board the portion of policy 103 under review refers to Title IX and a federal regulation regarding sex-separated facilities, and they urged caution and further legal review. \"That paragraph right there means, according to the attorney that I spoke to, that you as a district would voluntarily waive your ability to separate based on [sex],\" said Mary Beth, a resident and former district employee. \"I don't think that's what you guys want to do.\"

The board chair opened public comment by telling residents the policies were \"currently under review and will not be voted on at tonight's meeting,\" and that the policies would be returned to committee for further examination. That announcement was repeated at the start of the public-comment period.

Why it matters: The revisions under discussion reference Title IX and federal regulations about when recipients of federal education funds may provide separate restroom, locker-room and shower facilities. Commenters said the draft policy language is ambiguous and could limit the district’s ability to provide sex-separated facilities for athletics, overnight travel and certain activities. Several speakers also urged the district to involve parents, guidance counselors and legal counsel before finalizing substantive language.

During public comment, residents laid out three options for the board to consider. Mary Beth relayed recommendations she said came from an attorney: vote down or table the policy until a definitive court ruling; adopt only investigatory or procedural updates rather than substantive changes; or add an exclusion to the guideline language specifying it does not apply to sports, bathrooms and locker rooms. \"You could vote it down or you could table it until the Supreme Court makes a ruling,\" Mary Beth said. \"...You could only update the investigative procedures listed in the policy and not the substantive ones.\"

Other speakers echoed concerns about fairness and safety in athletics and facilities. Donna Myers, the second public commenter, cited participation and safety concerns for female athletes and said she was \"happy that you're postponing it until you have further information.\" Roslyn Daley raised questions about the authority of regulatory agencies and said the district should not feel compelled to adopt guidance she described as regulatory rather than statutory. Nancy Lapsevich, a Monroeville resident and registered nurse, described worries about younger students’ exposure in mixed locker-room settings. Nate Wakefield, a district alumnus, framed his remarks around parental responsibility and moral concerns.

The board did not take formal action to adopt policy language at the meeting. Instead, board members agreed to remove the policies from the current agenda and return them to committee for further review after collecting public feedback. Board members said they would \"absorb this information\" and consider it during the committee’s next review.

The board’s next steps will include committee consideration of the public input and any legal analysis the district requests. The district’s initial notice at the meeting stated that being “under review” means policies may see \"additional discussion, analysis, or revisions.\" The policy files and supporting documents are expected to be reviewed again at a future board meeting.

Ending: Board materials listed the policies under review as items 8.21 and 8.22 on the agenda; those items were formally removed from tonight’s agenda for future consideration. No new policy text was adopted at the meeting.","The Gateway School District board removed review of policies 103 and 104 from tonight’s agenda after multiple residents raised concerns about language tied to Title IX and gender-identity protections; commenters offered legal context and recommended options for the board.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Gateway SD board approves consent items, personnel actions and financial reports; multiple items tabled or removed

Gateway SD will not sponsor international travel program but will acknowledge participation

Residents urge caution as Gateway SD board pauses review of policies 103 and 104