Maryland lawmakers discuss new legislation to address growing squatter crisis

During a recent session of the Maryland General Assembly's Judiciary Committee, lawmakers engaged in a critical discussion about addressing the growing issue of squatting in residential properties. The meeting, held on January 21, 2025, highlighted the bipartisan nature of the problem, with representatives from both sides of the aisle acknowledging its widespread impact on communities across the state.

One of the key points raised was the challenge law enforcement faces when dealing with disputes over property ownership. Delegate Amber Simmons Phillips pointed out that police often lack the resources to resolve complex cases where multiple parties claim ownership. This has led to calls for a more structured approach, suggesting that such matters may be better suited for civil court rather than law enforcement intervention.

The committee members expressed concern over the current state of affairs, noting that the existing processes for handling squatting cases are inadequate. They emphasized the need for legislative action to address what they described as an "epidemic" of squatting in Maryland. While specific statistics on the number of squatters were not available, lawmakers shared anecdotal evidence from their districts, indicating that many residents are affected by this issue.

The discussion also touched on the operational aspects of any proposed legislation. Lawmakers sought clarity on how new measures would be implemented, particularly in distinguishing between single-family homes and multi-unit dwellings. This operationalization is crucial for ensuring that any new laws effectively address the nuances of different housing situations.

As the committee continues to deliberate on potential solutions, the urgency of the issue remains clear. The discussions reflect a growing recognition among Maryland lawmakers that addressing squatting is not just a legal challenge but a pressing community concern that requires immediate attention and action. The outcomes of these discussions could lead to significant changes in how property disputes are handled, ultimately aiming to protect the rights of homeowners while addressing the needs of those facing housing instability.