The City of Fairhope Board of Adjustments convened on January 23, 2025, to discuss a proposed in-car dining option for a new Culver's restaurant at the intersection of Highway 104 and Highway 181. The meeting focused on the unique business model that Culver's aims to implement, which would allow customers to order food via a smart device and have it delivered directly to their cars, effectively extending the restaurant's dining area into the parking lot.
The discussion began with an overview of the site, which is currently undeveloped, and the zoning regulations that apply. It was noted that while Fairhope has provisions for traditional restaurant uses, it lacks specific guidelines for in-car dining. This absence raised concerns among board members about the potential for the proposed parking spots to be misused as regular parking rather than designated dining areas.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Staff expressed apprehension that approving this model could set a precedent for other establishments to follow suit, potentially leading to a proliferation of similar setups that could complicate parking regulations. The city has both parking minimums and maximums, and there was uncertainty about whether the proposed plan would exceed these limits.
Culver's representatives, including civil engineer David DeChera, addressed the board, emphasizing that the in-car dining spots are intended to enhance customer service rather than serve as additional parking. They argued that the model is designed to optimize the use of space while meeting customer demand in a cost-effective manner.
Despite the presentation, staff recommended denial of the in-car dining use, citing concerns over parking requirements and the potential for misuse of the designated spots. The board's deliberations highlighted the challenges of integrating new dining concepts within existing zoning frameworks, as well as the need for clear guidelines to manage future applications.
The meeting concluded with the board considering the implications of the proposal and the necessity for further discussions on how to address the unique challenges posed by in-car dining options in Fairhope. No final decision was made, and the board plans to revisit the topic in future sessions.